Far from minimal!
\relative {
\stemUp
\repeat tremolo 16 {d32 a'32 }
\stemDown
\repeat tremolo 16 {d,32 a'32 }
\stemUp
\repeat tremolo 8 {d,32 a'32 }
\stemDown
\repeat tremolo 8 {d,32 a'32 }
}
However, you might want to extend the example to illustrate that
\stemUp/-Down
2007/12/6, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Far from minimal!
\relative {
\stemUp
\repeat tremolo 16 {d32 a'32 }
\stemDown
\repeat tremolo 16 {d,32 a'32 }
\stemUp
\repeat tremolo 8 {d,32 a'32 }
\stemDown
\repeat tremolo 8 {d,32 a'32 }
}
Yes, but Graham
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2007/12/6, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Far from minimal!
\relative {
\stemUp
\repeat tremolo 16 {d32 a'32 }
\stemDown
\repeat tremolo 16 {d,32 a'32 }
\stemUp
\repeat tremolo 8 {d,32 a'32 }
\stemDown
\repeat tremolo 8 {d,32 a'32 }
}
2007/12/7, Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[1] We now have 170 open bugs. Don't assume that yours is more
important than others.
I don't, and I hope you know that.
Clearly, there are two different bugs here: the \stemDown that doesn't
work, and the collision. I just assumed the former to
