I am getting a programming error with the following code:
%%%
\version "2.24.3" % 2.25.14 too
rightHand = \relative {
c''4( c c c | \break
g4 g \tuplet 3/2 4 { c,8) \change Staff = "lower" g[ g] } g4 |
}
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = "upper" \righ
Hi,
with 2.25.0
/Documentation/snippets/new/ancient-notation-templatemodern-transcription-of-gregorian-music.ly
emits:
programming error: no stem for note column
Cheers,
Harm
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https
On May 27, 2022, at 10:28, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>
> Le 27/05/2022 à 14:34, Dan Eble a écrit :
>> I would at least like to understand whether the error message is reasonable
>> first.
>
> Do you mean whether it is reasonable for \bar "" during a
>
Le 27/05/2022 à 14:34, Dan Eble a écrit :
I would at least like to understand whether the error message is
reasonable first.
Do you mean whether it is reasonable for \bar "" during a
note to trigger a programming error, or whether it is
reasonable for MensuralStaff to have "&q
On May 26, 2022, at 11:36, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> I can't tell why the commit "Refactor BarLine engraving" had that
> effect (and I'm not investigating). Dan, any thoughts? Should
> MensuralStaff simply be changed to have measureBarType = ##f
> (instead of "")?
I think that measureBarType =
ent = 5\cm
incipit-width = 3\cm
}
}
with recent versions it returns:
programming error: Loose column does not have right side to attach to.
First bad comit is:
commit 8ae26d8330c603d249fec5953a887de9fbcbe31c
Author: Dan Eble
Date: Thu Mar 10 20:08:31 2022 -0500
Refactor BarLine
;\layout {
> > indent = 5\cm
> > incipit-width = 3\cm
> >}
> > }
> >
> > with recent versions it returns:
> > programming error: Loose column does not have right side to attach to.
> >
> > First bad comit is
Le 26/05/2022 à 17:12, Thomas Morley a écrit :
Hi,
consider:
\score {
\new Staff \with { instrumentName = "" } { \incipit { c'1. } R1 }
\layout {
indent = 5\cm
incipit-width = 3\cm
}
}
with recent versions it returns:
programming error: Loose column does not
Hi,
consider:
\score {
\new Staff \with { instrumentName = "" } { \incipit { c'1. } R1 }
\layout {
indent = 5\cm
incipit-width = 3\cm
}
}
with recent versions it returns:
programming error: Loose column does not have right side to attach to.
First bad comit
Le 22/03/2022 à 21:29, Knute Snortum a écrit :
If you use strict-note-spacing (or strict-grace-spacing) with grace
notes that contain a spacer, a programming error is encountered. Here
is a MWE:
%%%
\version "2.23.6"
\relative c {
g4
\newSpacingSection
If you use strict-note-spacing (or strict-grace-spacing) with grace
notes that contain a spacer, a programming error is encountered. Here
is a MWE:
%%%
\version "2.23.6"
\relative c {
g4
\newSpacingSection
\override Score.SpacingSpanner.strict-note-spacing = ##t
\grace {
`bug.ly'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting music...
> Preprocessing graphical objects...
> Finding the ideal number of pages...
> Fitting music on 1 page...
> Drawing systems...
> programming error: no broken bound
> continuing, cross fingers
> programming error: no broken boun
Hi,
When I compile this file, I get the following output:
GNU LilyPond 2.19.83
Processing `bug.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Finding the ideal number of pages...
Fitting music on 1 page...
Drawing systems...
programming error: no broken bound
continuing
Am 27.12.19 um 00:33 schrieb Thomas Morley:
Hi,
the following code returns
programming error: Loose column does not have right side to attach to.
for all versions from 2.14.2 up to 2.21.0
No error for 2.12.3
{
\set Score.defaultBarType = #""
r2
b1\glissando
c'
}
You
Hi,
the following code returns
programming error: Loose column does not have right side to attach to.
for all versions from 2.14.2 up to 2.21.0
No error for 2.12.3
{
\set Score.defaultBarType = #""
r2
b1\glissando
c'
}
Cheers,
Harm
_
> %% chord needs two elements to trigger the bug
> }
>
> Versions 2.12.3 up to 2.16.2 print correctly, without error
>
> Versions 2.18.2 up to 2.19.82 print correctly, but return:
> programming error: Infinity or NaN encountered
>
> Current master does:
>
:
programming error: Infinity or NaN encountered
Current master does:
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Cheers,
Harm
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
great product:
1. When using too many grace notes and you run the code it will give a
message that says:
“Programming error: going back in MIDI time”
1. Instrument names that are not very short get chopped
2. If a bar in a 4/4 rhythm piece has 64 note
Sent from Mail<htt
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Crash-programming-error-trying-to-freeze-time-tp196555p196587.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gn
Hello McLaren,
in order to demonstrate good will, please apply the suggestions on code
formatting and minimal examples I gave on the parallel post here as
well; then I’ll act on the report.
Best, Simon
On 13.11.2016 07:14, mclaren wrote:
also "programming error: trying to move bac
also "programming error: trying to move backward in time"
also "programming error: Moment is not increasing. Aborting interpretation"
\version "2.19.49"
<<
% To get an interesting alternative bug, comment out the next line. Lilypond
finishes, but only eng
2016-09-02 9:59 GMT+02:00 Timothy Lanfear :
> See the similar report by me to this list on 6 August and Harm's reply.
>
> Timothy Lanfear
I've redone testing with Joel's file and a snapshot form latest master.
No error or warning.
Cheers,
Harm
Simon Albrecht writes:
> Hi Joel,
>
> thanks for the report.
>
> On the user list, I may have exaggerated my zeal for minimal
> examples. Here on the bug list, however, they are more strictly
> required, so the bass clef and bar checks (which I believe are
> certainly
362im/programming_error.ly'
>> Parsing...
>> Interpreting music...
>> Preprocessing graphical objects...
>> Interpreting music...
>> MIDI output to `programming_error.mid'...
>> programming error: asked to compute volume at +1.00 for dynamic
>> span o
...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Interpreting music...
MIDI output to `programming_error.mid'...
programming error: asked to compute volume at +1.00 for dynamic
span of duration 1.00 starting at 1
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: asked to compute volume
...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Interpreting music...
MIDI output to `programming_error.mid'...
programming error: asked to compute volume at +1.00 for dynamic
span of duration 1.00 starting at 1
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: asked to compute volume at +1.00 for dynamic
span
2.19.46
> Processing `tmp.ly'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting music...
> MIDI output to `tmp.midi'...
> programming error: asked to compute volume at +0.25 for dynamic span of
> duration 0.25 starting at 1/4 continuing, cross fingers
> programming error: asked to compute v
Bug first appears in 2.19.46.
\version "2.19.46"
\score {
{ a'4 << \new Voice a'4 \new Voice f'4 >> a'2 }
\midi{}
}
generates
GNU LilyPond 2.19.46
Processing `tmp.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
MIDI output to `tmp.midi'...
programming error: asked to compu
Using a grace note set that spans two staves, reduced from a vastly more
complex real score to a more minimal example, if I use a hairpin between the
sfz and the p indications, I get a programming error related to vertical
alignment that I am unable to understand, or eliminate. Can folks
simpler.ly <
> http://exp-k-p11-simpler.ly/>]...
> Processing `/home/andro/work/lilypond/proportion/exp-k-p11-simpler.ly <
> http://exp-k-p11-simpler.ly/>'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting music...
> Preprocessing graphical objects...
> programming error: My pure_y_common
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:23 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
>
> A more minimal example triggers the warning with TimeSignature:
>
Two with TimeSignature, one with Clef.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
objects...
programming error: vertical alignment called before line breaking
continuing, cross fingers
Finding the ideal number of pages...
Fitting music on 1 page...
Drawing systems...
Layout output to `arpeggio-no-staff-symbol.ps'...
Converting to `./arpeggio-no-staff-symbol.pdf'...
Success
g r} \parenthesize|
}
--snip--
GNU LilyPond 2.19.3
Processing `parenthesize-singlenotes-chords-rests.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
programming error: Don't know how to parenthesize spanners.
continuing, cross fingers
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Finding the ideal number of pages
the ideal number of pages...
Fitting music on 1 page...
Drawing systems...
programming error: bounds of this piece aren't breakable.
continuing, cross fingers
Layout output to `grace-end.ps'...
Converting to `./grace-end.pdf'...
--snip--
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3850
James
of pages...
Fitting music on 1 page...
Drawing systems...
programming error: bounds of this piece aren't breakable.
continuing, cross fingers
Layout output to `grace-end-2.ps'...
Converting to `./grace-end-2.pdf'...
Success: compilation successfully completed
--snip--
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond
this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/programming-error-with-markup-vspace-used-in-header-tp158634p159064.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
2014-02-04 Ralph Palmer ralphbugl...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
the following code returns:
programming error: Improbable offset for stencil: -inf staff space
Setting to zero.
although the printed output seems
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
the following code returns:
programming error: Improbable offset for stencil: -inf staff space
Setting to zero.
although the printed output seems to be correct.
\version 2.19.1
\header { title
Hi,
the following code returns:
programming error: Improbable offset for stencil: -inf staff space
Setting to zero.
although the printed output seems to be correct.
\version 2.19.1
\header { title = \markup \vspace #10 }
\markup xy
I noticed the error with 2.17.97, 2.18.0 and 2.19.1
Hello,
the following minimal example seems to produce the correct result
but lilypond raises a programming error: cyclic dependency:
calculation-in-progress encountered for #'control-points (Slur).
This might be related to Issue 2589.
--Felix
\version 2.16.0
\score {
\new Staff
Felix Janda wrote
Hello,
the following minimal example seems to produce the correct result
but lilypond raises a programming error: cyclic dependency:
calculation-in-progress encountered for #'control-points (Slur).
This might be related to Issue 2589.
sorry - I can't reproduce this! (I'm
2013/6/25 Eluze elu...@gmail.com:
Felix Janda wrote
Hello,
the following minimal example seems to produce the correct result
but lilypond raises a programming error: cyclic dependency:
calculation-in-progress encountered for #'control-points (Slur).
This might be related to Issue 2589
Thomas Morley thomasmorley65 at gmail.com writes:
2013/6/25 Eluze eluzew at gmail.com:
but lilypond raises a programming error: cyclic dependency:
calculation-in-progress encountered for #'control-points (Slur).
This might be related to Issue 2589.
sorry - I can't reproduce this! (I'm
Hello,
2013/4/23 Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org
I'm not top posting.
Following small example causes Lilypond to spit out programming error:
hyphen not finished yet [1]. Please either fix this bug or disallow the _
-- pattern for lyrics and print a useful error message.
Thank you
I'm not top posting.
Following small example causes Lilypond to spit out programming error:
hyphen not finished yet [1]. Please either fix this bug or disallow the _
-- pattern for lyrics and print a useful error message.
\version 2.16.0
sopranoLyrics = \lyricsto soprano {
% correct:
foo
Thomas Morley writes:
2013/3/30 Colin Hall colingh...@gmail.com
Thomas, devs, what do you want to do with this thread?
As David pointed out, it is expected behaviour now. Therefore I'd reject
the bug report.
OK, the bug report is duly rejected.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
on the German forum has tried this, for good
reasons, and it failed with a programming error.
David explained that this is not surprising.
So, we can treat this as a bug, with a resolution that Lilypond
detectings the condition and reports it as an error and exits.
Or the feature of ChordNames within
2013/3/30 Colin Hall colingh...@gmail.com
Thomas, devs, what do you want to do with this thread?
As I understand it, a user on the German forum has tried this, for good
reasons, and it failed with a programming error.
David explained that this is not surprising.
So, we can treat
Hi,
this code used to work with 2.16.2:
\version 2.16.2
\new Staff \with { \accepts ChordNames }
\new ChordNames \chordmode { \override ChordName #'Y-offset = #-1 c }
With 2.17.12 an programming error occurs:
GNU LilyPond 2.17.12
Processing `atest-22.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music
an programming error occurs:
GNU LilyPond 2.17.12
Processing `atest-22.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
programming error: duplicate axis group
continuing, cross fingers
Preprocessing graphical objects...
programming error: vertical alignment called before line breaking
continuing
2013/3/28 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
[...]
Why would you want to have ChordNames internal to a Staff?
It was requested by a german user. He wants the ChordNames printed in a Staff.
Is there a better way to achieve it?
[...]
I think if we
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
2013/3/28 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
[...]
Why would you want to have ChordNames internal to a Staff?
It was requested by a german user. He wants the ChordNames printed in a Staff.
Is
2013/3/28 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
2013/3/28 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
[...]
Why would you want to have ChordNames internal to a Staff?
It was requested by a german user. He wants
Comment #3 on issue 1412 by plros...@gmail.com: programming error: Going
back in MIDI time
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1412
The same happens with \appoggiatura. It looks like Lilypond tries to
borrow time from the previous note, but there is none. It may be OK
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #17 on issue 2085 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085
Compiled input/regression/tablature-harmonic-functions.ly with 2.15.24
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push
Comment #14 on issue 2085 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085
Counted down to 20111219, please push
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Patch-push fixed_2_15_23
Comment #15 on issue 2085 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085
pushed as ab8c075..e8038c8 to staging
Comment #11 on issue 2085 by d...@gnu.org: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085
There are a number of cases in the manuals where stencils are just cleared
out with ##f. That's reasonably
Updates:
Cc: adam.spi...@gmail.com
Comment #12 on issue 2085 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085
Issue 2118 has been merged into this issue
Updates:
Labels: Patch-review
Comment #7 on issue 2085 by lilypond...@gmail.com: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085#c7
Patchy the autobot says: LGTM
Updates:
Labels: Patch-new
Comment #8 on issue 2085 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085#c8
Allow string numbers to have #f stencil without programming error (Issue
Updates:
Labels: Patch-review
Comment #9 on issue 2085 by lilypond...@gmail.com: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085#c9
Patchy the autobot says: LGTM
Comment #10 on issue 2085 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085
Another solution is to \override 'stencil to 'point-stencil instead of #f.
This is described in the Learning
Updates:
Labels: Patch-new
Comment #5 on issue 2085 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085#c5
Allow string numbers to have #f stencil without programming error (Issue
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: carl.d.s...@gmail.com
Comment #6 on issue 2085 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085
(No comment was entered for this change
Comment #3 on issue 2085 by d...@gnu.org: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085
Since not being able to override the stencils to ##f (the obvious way to
switch off string numbers) without warning leads
Comment #4 on issue 2085 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085
I will try to get the simple fix done on Saturday.
___
bug-lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 2085 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085
This is probably caused in New_fingering_engraver, in the position_scripts
() function.
To quote from the code
Updates:
Labels: Type-Ugly
Comment #1 on issue 2085 by gra...@percival-music.ca: Overriding stencil of
StringNumber leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085
(No comment was entered for this change
objects...
programming error: cannot align on self: empty element
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: cannot align on self: empty element
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: cannot align on self: empty element
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: cannot align on self: empty
Status: Accepted
Owner:
New issue 2085 by idragos...@gmail.com: Overriding stencil of StringNumber
leads to programming error messages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085
the awful spacing of input/regression/tablature-harmonic-functions.ly
let me to investigate
Am Wednesday, 14. September 2011, 06:47:50 schrieb Colin Campbell:
On 11-09-13 09:29 PM, Nick Payne wrote:
Ok, the following small example reproduces the error on my system with
2.15.11:
The minimal example is (the normal fingering -1 does not have any influence,
so it should be removed,
On 14/09/11 08:34, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Nick Payne wrote Tuesday, September 13, 2011 11:25 PM
The problem is that the score is quite large, and the log gives no
indication at all about where the error is coming from. I guess I can
try commenting out different sections to see if I can isolate
On 11-09-13 09:29 PM, Nick Payne wrote:
Ok, the following small example reproduces the error on my system with
2.15.11:
%==
\version 2.15.11
\language english
fingering = {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
\set strokeFingerOrientations =
Updates:
Labels: -Type-Other -Priority-Low Type-Defect
Comment #1 on issue 1492 by percival.music.ca: page-count and programming
error: number of pages is out of bounds
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1492
(No comment was entered for this change
Comment #2 on issue 1412 by fiee.vis...@gmail.com: programming error: Going
back in MIDI time
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1412
Going back happens regularly with grace notes.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond
lilyp...@googlecode.com writes:
Comment #2 on issue 1412 by fiee.vis...@gmail.com: programming error:
Going back in MIDI time
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1412
Going back happens regularly with grace notes.
I think that it would be nice to delay Midi output
Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote in message
news:4d9fdba1.9080...@internode.on.net...
The following minimal example generates the error programming error:
cannot align on self: empty element in the console log.
\version 2.13.58
\relative c' {
\tempo 4 = 72
\override
The following minimal example generates the error programming error:
cannot align on self: empty element in the console log.
\version 2.13.58
\relative c' {
\tempo 4 = 72
\override Score.MetronomeMark #'stencil = ##f
c4 c c c
}
Comment out either the \tempo indication
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #4 on issue 1253 by brownian.box: programming error: (de)crescendo
on items with specified volume.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1253
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
bug
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Other Priority-Low
New issue 1492 by ralphbug...@gmail.com: page-count and programming error:
number of pages is out of bounds
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1492
2011/1/5 Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net:
I have a score
pages.
By adding page-count = 2 to the paper block it fits without any problem
on
two pages but the log then contains programming error: number of pages
is
out of bounds.
With 2.13.45, this minimal example reproduces the error in the log. This
example also gets warning: couldn't fit
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_47
Comment #3 on issue 1253 by percival.music.ca: programming error:
(de)crescendo on items with specified volume.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1253
Thanks, pushed.
Attachments:
0001-Better-wording
but the log then contains programming error: number of pages is
out of bounds.
With 2.13.45, this minimal example reproduces the error in the log. This
example also gets warning: couldn't fit music on page in the log, which
doesn't happen with the actual score, where I only see the first error
Comment #1 on issue 1253 by markpolesky: programming error: (de)crescendo
on items with specified volume.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1253
programming error: (de)crescendo on items with specified
volume.
Wouldn't it be enough simply to reword the error message? I
Updates:
Labels: Patch
Comment #2 on issue 1253 by percival.music.ca: programming error:
(de)crescendo on items with specified volume.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1253
Patch looks ok to me, but let's make sure that we have the Patch label
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Other
New issue 1412 by RalphBugList: programming error: Going back in MIDI time
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1412
MIDIback.ly
\version 2.13.35
music = \new Staff {
\tempo 4 = 120
\time 2/4
\set Staff.midiInstrument
On 18 Nov 2010, at 12:37, Ralph Palmer wrote:
Thanks for your report. This has been accepted as Issue 1412 :
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1412
Fine.
Pondly (as Valentin would say),
Pond-lily Yours,
Hans
___
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Warning
New issue 1253 by brownian.box: programming error: (de)crescendo on items
with specified volume.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1253
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2010-09/msg00027
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #4 on issue 1142 by brownian.box: \pageBreak + system-count +
lyrics : programming error: bounds of this piece aren't breakable.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1142
Great, thank You
Status: Accepted
Owner:
New issue 1142 by brownian.box: \pageBreak + system-count + lyrics :
programming error: bounds of this piece aren't breakable.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1142
\version 2.13.25
\relative c'' {
\repeat unfold 20 { c4 c c c
Updates:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Critical Regression
Comment #1 on issue 1142 by brownian.box: \pageBreak + system-count +
lyrics : programming error: bounds of this piece aren't breakable.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1142
Sorry, labels
Comment #2 on issue 1142 by brownian.box: \pageBreak + system-count +
lyrics : programming error: bounds of this piece aren't breakable.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1142
Sorry, i should mention: programming errors and exitcode = 1 and no
output
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_26
Comment #3 on issue 1142 by joeneeman: \pageBreak + system-count + lyrics :
programming error: bounds of this piece aren't breakable.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1142
(No comment was entered for this change
Status: Accepted
Owner:
New issue 1113 by brownian.box: score with Ambitus_engraver and voice with
spacers only produces programming error
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1113
Reported by David Kastrup:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2010-06/msg00042
Kastrup
On Wed 09 Jun 2010, 17:02 Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:55 PM, James Bailey
derhindem...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am I to understand that a programming error should have a bug report?
Yes; current policy is to record all warnings (even false warnings,
which produce good
Updates:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low Warning
Comment #1 on issue 1113 by brownian.box: score with Ambitus_engraver and
voice with spacers only produces programming error
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1113
(No comment was entered for this change
Comment #2 on issue 1113 by d...@gnu.org: score with Ambitus_engraver and
voice with spacers only produces programming error
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1113
Please note that the actual reported simplified test case throwing the
error was
\new Voice \with {\consists
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Graham Percival
gra...@percival-music.ca wrote:
Focus on processing other old reports that haven't been dealt with
yet.
I have (sorta) planned to do this as soon as I have a bit more time
(several dozen hours are easily required), aka later this month.
As for
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:32:46PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
I have (sorta) planned to do this as soon as I have a bit more time
(several dozen hours are easily required), aka later this month.
If it takes you longer than 10 minutes to process a single email,
you're doing something
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo