Re: Documentation Tweak: Octave Checks

Le 14/06/2021 à 08:53, 6d8fd379d7b54...@posteo.net a écrit : Hi, I got confused by the Octave Checks documentation: https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.22/Documentation/notation-big-page#octave-checks

Documentation Tweak: Octave Checks

Hi, I got confused by the Octave Checks documentation: https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.22/Documentation/notation-big-page#octave-checks https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/blob/d408cdc68629ef6df72de0d0ace9c460016565f8/Documentation/en/notation/pitches.itely#L706 I thought the ='4 was some special

Tweaked X-offset returns to the value it would have had without \tweak

-breaking")   } } {   \override NoteHead.color = "red"   \override NoteHead.X-offset = 3.14159   c   \tweak color "blue"   \tweak X-offset -1   e } This makes two overrides to NoteHead properties, one to color and one to X-offset, and shows their values at various s

Re: \parenthesize is not affected by \tweak

n 29, 2019, 15:07 Pierre Perol-Schneider < > pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com wrote: > >> What I mean is that the manual does not says "music object". >> What I mean is that "\tweak color #red \parenthesize c' " has the same >> output than "\parenthesize \tw

Re: \parenthesize is not affected by \tweak

te: > What I mean is that the manual does not says "music object". > What I mean is that "\tweak color #red \parenthesize c' " has the same > output than "\parenthesize \tweak color #red c'" -- weired to me. > What I mean is that in "c'-\tweak color

Re: \parenthesize is not affected by \tweak

Pierre Perol-Schneider writes: > What I mean is that the manual does not says "music object". What I > mean is that "\tweak color #red \parenthesize c' " has the same output > than "\parenthesize \tweak color #red c'" -- weired to me. What I > mea

Re: \parenthesize is not affected by \tweak

What I mean is that the manual does not says "music object". What I mean is that "\tweak color #red \parenthesize c' " has the same output than "\parenthesize \tweak color #red c'" -- weired to me. What I mean is that in "c'-\tweak color #red -1", #1 is n

Re: \parenthesize is not affected by \tweak

Pierre Perol-Schneider writes: >> Le mar. 29 janv. 2019 à 17:57, David Kastrup a écrit: >> >>> Pierre Perol-Schneider writes: >>> >>> > Hi Bug Squad, >>> > >>> > %% Snippet: >>> > \version "2.19

Re: \parenthesize is not affected by \tweak

So? Basically the manual says: " The \tweak command applies to the music object that immediately follows value in the music stream." Considering your answer, do you mean that " \tweak color #red \parenthesize" does not follow the value? Do you mean that parenthizes are no

Re: \parenthesize is not affected by \tweak

Pierre Perol-Schneider writes: > Hi Bug Squad, > > %% Snippet: > \version "2.19.82" > { > \tweak color #red \parenthesize c' > %vs: > \tweak ParenthesesItem.color #red \parenthesize c' > } > %% So? The color also does not affect Stem, LedgerLine o

\parenthesize is not affected by \tweak

Hi Bug Squad, %% Snippet: \version "2.19.82" { \tweak color #red \parenthesize c' %vs: \tweak ParenthesesItem.color #red \parenthesize c' } %% Cheers, Pierre ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.o

Re: Tweak on Clef’s X-extent influences on Beam’s vertical position

"Simon Albrecht" wrote in message news:56536880.1060...@mail.de... \version "2.19.31" { a'8 \once\override Staff.Clef.X-extent = #'(0 . .8) \clef bass a, b, c \clef treble a'8 \once\override Staff.Clef.X-extent = #'(0 . 0) \clef bass a, b, c } %%

Tweak on clef spills over

Hello, in the following example, the tweak on one clef spills over to the next: % \version "2.19.31" { \clef treble a'8 \tweak Clef.X-extent #'(0 . 0) \clef bass a, b, c \clef treble a'4 } % Yours, Simon _

Tweak on Clef’s X-extent influences on Beam’s vertical position

\version "2.19.31" { a'8 \once\override Staff.Clef.X-extent = #'(0 . .8) \clef bass a, b, c \clef treble a'8 \once\override Staff.Clef.X-extent = #'(0 . 0) \clef bass a, b, c } %% Yours, Simon ___ bug-lilypond mailing list

Re: Tweak rest.staff-position fails with beam

<https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4657/> On 30.10.2015 14:28, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello, if a beam is present, tweaking rest.staff-position remains without effect: %%% \version "2.19.28" { \voiceTwo f'16[ \tweak staff-po

Re: Tweak rest.staff-position fails with beam

On 30.10.2015 14:28, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello, if a beam is present, tweaking rest.staff-position remains without effect: Should’ve added that \once\override works fine. %%% \version "2.19.28" { \voiceTwo f'16[ \tweak staff-position 10 r16 16] }

Tweak rest.staff-position fails with beam

Hello, if a beam is present, tweaking rest.staff-position remains without effect: %%% \version "2.19.28" { \voiceTwo f'16[ \tweak staff-position 10 r16 16] } %%% Output attached. Yours, Simon ___ bug-lilypond ma

Re: \tweak fails on MultiMeasureRests

On 18/02/15 17:27, Simon Albrecht wrote: Hello list, it seems that the \tweak command does not have any effect on multi measure rests, neither with nor without specifying the grob: \version 2.19.8 { \tweak MultiMeasureRest.color #red R1 \tweak color #red R1 } I couldn't find an entry

\tweak fails on MultiMeasureRests

Hello list, it seems that the \tweak command does not have any effect on multi measure rests, neither with nor without specifying the grob: \version 2.19.8 { \tweak MultiMeasureRest.color #red R1 \tweak color #red R1 } I couldn't find an entry in the issue tracker, nor any mention

Re: NR and allocating tweak command to variable

David Kastrup writes: Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net writes: I was trying to allocate a tweak command to a variable and eventually managed to get it to work after finding what I needed by a search of the lilypond-user archives ( http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011

NR and allocating tweak command to variable

I was trying to allocate a tweak command to a variable and eventually managed to get it to work after finding what I needed by a search of the lilypond-user archives ( http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-09/msg00279.html). However, I was initially misled by the NR having

Re: NR and allocating tweak command to variable

Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net writes: I was trying to allocate a tweak command to a variable and eventually managed to get it to work after finding what I needed by a search of the lilypond-user archives ( http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-09/msg00279.html

Re: Issue 2164 in lilypond: Learning Manual: Better explanation with updated example for \once tweak

Updates: Status: Verified Comment #7 on issue 2164 by elu...@gmail.com: Learning Manual: Better explanation with updated example for \once tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2164 (No comment was entered for this change

Re: Issue 2164 in lilypond: Learning Manual: Better explanation with updated example for \once tweak

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -Patch-push Comment #6 on issue 2164 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Learning Manual: Better explanation with updated example for \once tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2164 Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:00:45 + (08:00 +

Re: Issue 2164 in lilypond: Learning Manual: Better explanation with updated example for \once tweak

Updates: Labels: -Patch-countdown Patch-push Comment #5 on issue 2164 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Learning Manual: Better explanation with updated example for \once tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2164 Counted down to 20120103, please push

Issue 2164 in lilypond: Learning Manual: Better explanation with updated example for \once tweak

Status: Started Owner: pkx1...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Documentation New issue 2164 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Learning Manual: Better explanation with updated example for \once tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2164 Submitted by drippingtone+lilyp...@gmail.com

Re: Issue 2164 in lilypond: Learning Manual: Better explanation with updated example for \once tweak

Updates: Labels: Patch-new Comment #1 on issue 2164 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Learning Manual: Better explanation with updated example for \once tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2164#c1 Doc: LM adjusted explanation for \once This is for Tracker issue 2164

Re: Issue 2164 in lilypond: Learning Manual: Better explanation with updated example for \once tweak

Comment #2 on issue 2164 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Learning Manual: Better explanation with updated example for \once tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2164#c2 Doc: LM adjusted explanation for \once This is for Tracker issue 2164 As suggested by email on lilypond-user

Re: Issue 2164 in lilypond: Learning Manual: Better explanation with updated example for \once tweak

Updates: Labels: Patch-review Comment #3 on issue 2164 by lilypond...@gmail.com: Learning Manual: Better explanation with updated example for \once tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2164#c3 Patchy the autobot says: LGTM

Re: Issue 1789 in lilypond: \tweak does not work for changing control-points of any but the first tie in chorded notes

Updates: Status: Accepted Comment #6 on issue 1789 by philehol...@googlemail.com: \tweak does not work for changing control-points of any but the first tie in chorded notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1789 (No comment was entered for this change

Re: Issue 1751 in lilypond: Most analysis brackets get incorrect event-cause info, breaking point-and-click \tweak

Updates: Status: Verified Comment #3 on issue 1751 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Most analysis brackets get incorrect event-cause info, breaking point-and-click \tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1751 (No comment was entered for this change

Re: Issue 1789 in lilypond: \tweak does not work for changing control-points of any but the first tie in chorded notes

Comment #4 on issue 1789 by d...@gnu.org: \tweak does not work for changing control-points of any but the first tie in chorded notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1789 Could you explain what you are trying to tell us? Tie directions are not the same as control points

Re: Issue 1789 in lilypond: \tweak does not work for changing control-points of any but the first tie in chorded notes

Comment #5 on issue 1789 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: \tweak does not work for changing control-points of any but the first tie in chorded notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1789 Could you explain what you are trying to tell us? That the control points looked good enough

Issue 1789 in lilypond: \tweak is 'broken' when trying to tie chorded notes (other than the first note in the chord)

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low New issue 1789 by pkx1...@gmail.com: \tweak is 'broken' when trying to tie chorded notes (other than the first note in the chord) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1789 Here is the main thread: --snip

Re: Issue 1789 in lilypond: \tweak is 'broken' when trying to tie chorded notes (other than the first note in the chord)

Comment #1 on issue 1789 by reinhold...@gmail.com: \tweak is 'broken' when trying to tie chorded notes (other than the first note in the chord) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1789 This is really a bug with control-points, because changing the color of the two ties

Re: Issue 1789 in lilypond: \tweak does not work for changing control-points of any but the first tie in chorded notes

Updates: Summary: \tweak does not work for changing control-points of any but the first tie in chorded notes Comment #2 on issue 1789 by d...@gnu.org: \tweak does not work for changing control-points of any but the first tie in chorded notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail

Re: Issue 1789 in lilypond: \tweak does not work for changing control-points of any but the first tie in chorded notes

Comment #3 on issue 1789 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: \tweak does not work for changing control-points of any but the first tie in chorded notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1789 Where is the bug? { c'~ g'~ q c'^~ g'_~ q } Attachments: temp.png 5.1 KB

Re: Issue 1733 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak

Comment #5 on issue 1733 by philehol...@googlemail.com: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1733 If I run the command above with 2.15.5, I get the output at the bottom. I'm not convinced that's correct. Processing `1733.ly' Parsing... 1733

Re: Issue 1733 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak

Comment #6 on issue 1733 by d...@gnu.org: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1733 I don't see anything wrong with the reaction for this input. The input itself is nonsensical and should use ##t rather than #t. So I think the problem

Re: Issue 1733 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak

lilypond-4 wrote: If I run the command above with 2.15.5, I get the output at the bottom. I'm not convinced that's correct. Unbound variable: t \tweak #'transparent ##unspecified c e an old question: should it be ##t or just #t? a small example to illustrate the dilemma (from

Re: Issue 1733 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak

Updates: Status: Verified Comment #7 on issue 1733 by philehol...@googlemail.com: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1733 (No comment was entered for this change.) ___ bug-lilypond mailing

Re: Issue 1733 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak

On 7/24/11 4:12 AM, -Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote: If I run the command above with 2.15.5, I get the output at the bottom. I'm not convinced that's correct. Unbound variable: t \tweak #'transparent ##unspecified c e an old question: should it be ##t or just #t? a small example

Re: Issue 1751 in lilypond: Most analysis brackets get incorrect event-cause info, breaking point-and-click \tweak

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_15_5 backport Comment #1 on issue 1751 by n.putt...@gmail.com: Most analysis brackets get incorrect event-cause info, breaking point-and-click \tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1751

Re: Issue 1751 in lilypond: Most analysis brackets get incorrect event-cause info, breaking point-and-click \tweak

Updates: Labels: -backport backported fixed_2_14_2 Comment #2 on issue 1751 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Most analysis brackets get incorrect event-cause info, breaking point-and-click \tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1751 Backported, with commits

Issue 1751 in lilypond: Most analysis brackets get incorrect event-cause info, breaking point-and-click \tweak

Status: Started Owner: n.putt...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1751 by n.putt...@gmail.com: Most analysis brackets get incorrect event-cause info, breaking point-and-click \tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1751 Since

Re: Issue 1733 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak

Updates: Labels: -backport fixed_2_15_4 Comment #4 on issue 1733 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1733 Backported ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond

Re: Issue 1733 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -Patch-review fixed_2_15_5 backport Comment #3 on issue 1733 by n.putt...@gmail.com: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1733 d5766025a1573c709dfa3c9663c1c6b903abec24

Issue 1733 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak

Status: Started Owner: n.putt...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 1733 by n.putt...@gmail.com: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1733 \displayLilyMusic has no display method to accommodate \tweak; all \tweak

Re: Issue 1733 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak

Updates: Labels: Patch-new Comment #1 on issue 1733 by n.putt...@gmail.com: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1733 http://codereview.appspot.com/4645077/ ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug

Re: Issue 1733 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak

Updates: Labels: -Patch-new Patch-review Comment #2 on issue 1733 by pkx1...@gmail.com: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1733 Reg tests pass and no make problems. ___ bug-lilypond mailing

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Updates: Status: Verified Comment #16 on issue 1180 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 (No comment was entered for this change

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Comment #14 on issue 1180 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 Sorry, this isn't fixed - at least on the translated versions of the page. I don't know

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Comment #15 on issue 1180 by percival.music.ca: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 Don't consider translations. If the English page is fixed, mark this verified. After 2.14, if there's a lot more

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Comment #13 on issue 1180 by percival.music.ca: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 Urs: you're not supposed to look at git stuff. Always wait until the next devel release. Trevor: I've added you

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Comment #7 on issue 1180 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 Hi Trevor, good point. If I'll see something I'll have a new look at it. Best Urs

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Comment #8 on issue 1180 by tdanielsmusic: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 I've just pushed two commits as fixes for this issue. The first commit changes the example to use explicitly instantiated

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Comment #9 on issue 1180 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 When (and where) can I see these changes. So far I am only working with the binary releases, and I don't see

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Comment #10 on issue 1180 by pkx1...@hotmail.com: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=e3ae33d7fc91b79043ced4514a8670ce4d9ed2d0

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Comment #11 on issue 1180 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 Sorry, I don't see how I can use these links. Probably it's sufficient to wait for a release to evaluate

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

When (and where) can I see these changes. So far I am only working with the binary releases, and I don't see this will be changing shortly ... The changes are in git for anyone who can build the docs and will appear in the documentation to 2.13.29 when that is released. I guess

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Am 15.07.2010 00:08, schrieb Trevor Daniels: When (and where) can I see these changes. So far I am only working with the binary releases, and I don't see this will be changing shortly ... The changes are in git for anyone who can build the docs and will appear in the documentation to

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

OK, then please change the status to fixed. I can't - I don't have sufficient permissions. Or is this impossible because of the 1015 issue? Maybe .. I don't know. Trevor ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_29 Comment #12 on issue 1180 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 Having now seen the pdf output of the newest

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Comment #2 on issue 1180 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 Your tweak looks fine at first glance. But: As I mentioned here http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Updates: Status: Accepted Comment #3 on issue 1180 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 (No comment was entered for this change

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Updates: Blockedon: 1015 Comment #4 on issue 1180 by percival.music.ca: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 A link would help: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/learning/real-music

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Comment #5 on issue 1180 by n.puttock: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 If anybody still wants to work on this, it's a voicing issue: the example starts off in the main voice, creates several new

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Comment #6 on issue 1180 by tdanielsmusic: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 Thanks for the hint, Neil. This example would greatly benefit from being re-written to use explicitly instantiated

Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Documentation Priority-Low New issue 1180 by lilyli...@googlemail.com: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 Chapter 4.5.3 of the LM demonstrates how to tweak

Re: Issue 1180 in lilypond: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation)

Comment #1 on issue 1180 by pkx1...@hotmail.com: LM 4.5.3 Real music example needs additional tweak (plus explanation) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1180 This is the tweak needed after the first 'r2' but before the 'c4.\( ' \once \override PhrasingSlur #'control-points

tweak

I'm not top posting. Things look much better after issuing \override Beam #'concaveness = #0 (or some mild value near zero - I use it \once). So the problem is gone. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org

Re: tweak

The next time you send follow-ups to emails on the mailing list, please keep the same subject line. It takes some effort to figure out what problem you refer to. Great that you have figured out the solution yourself and thanks for sharing it to others on the mailing list. /Mats Alex Shanin