Pe 15 oct. 2017 12:57 PM, "SF Markus Elfring"
a scris:
> Are the chances better to extend the tool “remake” then?
…
> Probably.
Can it be that our software development resources are also too limited
for mentioned tasks?
I don't know.
> My intention was to
The $(if ...) function uses strlen to decide if the expanded condition is
true. But it only needs to know if the string is not empty, and not the
length of the string.
I think it only needs to test if the first character is not nul. This is
the change:
1248c1248
< result = strlen
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #52209 (project make):
Patch added.
The rational is that this is an operation needed to support rebuilding of
targets when recipes change.
Support for rebuilding of targets on recipe change requires the recipe of
every target to be expanded and compared with its
> Are the chances better to extend the tool “remake” then?
…
> Probably.
Can it be that our software development resources are also too limited
for mentioned tasks?
> My intention was to provide profiling information by default …
This is generally fine.
Do any collaboration challenges
Pe 15 oct. 2017 12:02 PM, "SF Markus Elfring"
a scris:
> Before talking about formats and graphical representation,
> I advise you to ask if Paul agrees with this kind thing.
Are the chances better to extend the tool “remake” then?
> Before talking about formats and graphical representation,
> I advise you to ask if Paul agrees with this kind thing.
Are the chances better to extend the tool “remake” then?
https://github.com/rocky/remake/wiki
Regards,
Markus
___
Bug-make mailing
Before talking about formats and graphical representation, I advise you to
ask if Paul agrees with this kind thing. I was personally very disappointed
when he rejected the profiling patches I proposed and reworked in the form
that made most sense from a practical pov, because he thought even very