Hi bluhm,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 8:10 AM Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 09:51:33AM -0300, K R wrote:
> > >How-To-Repeat:
> >
> > On the server side:
> >
> > pass in quick inet6 proto udp to egress divert-to ::1 port 12345
> >
> > # nc -u -k -l ::1 12345
> >
> > On the client
> OK to violate RFC for performance and simplicity?
I also think the RFC is asking too much (insensitive to the cost on
software routers).
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 09:51:33AM -0300, K R wrote:
> >How-To-Repeat:
>
> On the server side:
>
> pass in quick inet6 proto udp to egress divert-to ::1 port 12345
>
> # nc -u -k -l ::1 12345
>
> On the client side:
>
> $ nc -u $server_ipv6 65000
>
> Anything typed in the client nc will appea
>Synopsis: pf: UDP divert-to to a local addr won't send traffic back
>Category: kernel pf amd64
>Environment:
System : OpenBSD 7.5
Details : OpenBSD 7.5-current (GENERIC) #177: Wed Jul 10
06:03:30 MDT 2024
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/