John Hanks wrote:
>
> Does anyone know if a third version is in the works or if I should keep
> trying to make the second version work on my machines?
MS just released version 3 of that Security Bulletin, with a 3rd "official"
version of the patch for W2K. Again, the URL for the bulletin is h
Ben Greenbaum wrote:
>
> As I expected, there has been a flood of responses to the news about ISC's
> plan for a bind-members program. Rather than approve each, I have
> summarized many of them here.
Personally, from what I'm seeing in these responses, a lot of people are
jumping to conclusions,
nd works with several
browsers. Its biggest downside is that it's for Windows only. I highly
recommend checking it out if you're looking for better cookie management.
--
Michael Bryan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]