On 24/06/2008, Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/24 Joseph D. Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Yes, since b07 back in March, *no* binary plugs are required to build the
> > OpenJDK 6 sources from Sun. The only remaining plug is for SNMP support,
> > which is not required fun
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
Martin Buchholz skrev den 24-06-2008 19:57:
---
I am in favor of the fundamental change to a "configure + make" model,
instead of configury stuff being done in the Makefiles as is the
current practice.
I agree, but I have understood that this work has been
Martin Buchholz skrev den 24-06-2008 19:57:
---
I am in favor of the fundamental change to a "configure + make" model,
instead of configury stuff being done in the Makefiles as is the
current practice.
I agree, but I have understood that this work has been done in IcedTea
already. Is ther
On 24/06/2008, David Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > 2008/6/23 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> > > Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > OT, but the mention of binary plugs in the slides made me question
> > whether they are still relevant given Iced
Hi.
I have tried to get an OpenSolaris build environment for OpenJDK7 up and
running (just for the fun of it), and have installed ss-dev and updated
everything as much as I could. The forrest should be up to date as of
the time of writing.
My problem right now is that the "gmake" fails with
Changeset: c3f2b8992300
Author:xdono
Date: 2008-06-20 08:45 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/langtools/rev/c3f2b8992300
Added tag jdk7-b29 for changeset dec081837b01
! .hgtags
Changeset: 0a5b87833562
Author:xdono
Date: 2008-06-20 08:45 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/0a5b87833562
Added tag jdk7-b29 for changeset e21f4266466c
! .hgtags
Changeset: 2c23d2441366
Author:xdono
Date: 2008-06-20 08:45 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jaxws/rev/2c23d2441366
Added tag jdk7-b29 for changeset 836c55713aba
! .hgtags
Changeset: 4d8da2b3c124
Author:xdono
Date: 2008-06-20 08:45 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jaxp/rev/4d8da2b3c124
Added tag jdk7-b29 for changeset 617ee8607cfd
! .hgtags
Changeset: c70a245cad3a
Author:dcubed
Date: 2008-05-09 08:55 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/hotspot/rev/c70a245cad3a
6670684: 4/5 SA command universe did not print out CMS space information
Summary: Forward port of Yumin's fix for 6670684 from HSX-11; Yumin verifie
Changeset: 76600bc57421
Author:xdono
Date: 2008-06-20 08:44 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/corba/rev/76600bc57421
Added tag jdk7-b29 for changeset 8b71960f79ce
! .hgtags
Changeset: 14c2c623d687
Author:xdono
Date: 2008-06-20 08:44 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/rev/14c2c623d687
Added tag jdk7-b29 for changeset 31e08f70e88d
! .hgtags
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2008/6/23 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
OT, but the mention of binary plugs in the slides made me question
whether they are still relevant given IcedTea passed
the JCK without any? For OpenJDK6, is this now just the optional SNMP
sup
The JDK's Makefiles are not coherent; they do not look like they
were designed using a common architecture.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:17 PM, David Herron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CC?=gcc
> CPP?=g++
A particularly egregious example is the use of the make variable CPP.
Some Makefiles use CPP to
Hi Dalibor,
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 00:09 +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > I would like to find a way to do this cleaner though. But the current
> > code relies on being on the bootclasspath which makes things a little
> > tricky.
> >
> Landon suggested a while ago exploring https://scripting.dev.
2008/6/24 Joseph D. Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, since b07 back in March, *no* binary plugs are required to build the
> OpenJDK 6 sources from Sun. The only remaining plug is for SNMP support,
> which is not required functionality according to the platform spec and is
> thus not tested by the
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2008/6/23 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 11:43 -0700, David Herron wrote:
Mark Wielaard wrote:
In my JavaOne talk Sandeep and I had worked up a hack with the same
purpose. He's been busy enough that he hadn't
2008/6/23 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 11:43 -0700, David Herron wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>> In my JavaOne talk Sandeep and I had worked up a hack with the same
>>> purpose. He's been busy enough that he hadn't
18 matches
Mail list logo
