Re: Somewhat wonkier Windows problem

2013-05-22 Thread David Chase
I think that there is a 64-bit compiler in there, though it seems to not be the default. I saw three different command-line choices, and one is 64-bit, which I am using. The available copies of the DirectX SDK (later than 2004) were not recognized as 32-bit by configure -- doesn't mean that they

Re: Somewhat wonkier Windows problem

2013-05-22 Thread Tim Bell
We are in the process of evaluating build tool selections for JDK8. For Windows, Anthony Petrov started the work and supplied a patch [1], plus more changes for hotspot. I have successfully completed OpenJDK builds of the JDK8 build forest using Visual Studio 2012. The runtime .dll selectio

Re: Somewhat wonkier Windows problem

2013-05-22 Thread David Chase
VS2012, at least the one I downloaded recently, pretends to compile, and since ADLC ran, I think it produces images that run, too, so there is some hope. It darn sure won't run if I don't get the build to complete. Getting the DLLs right, I assume I'll drive off that bridge when I come to it.

Re: Somewhat wonkier Windows problem

2013-05-22 Thread Kelly O'Hair
If you accept the fact that the build may complete but not work, then fine. But if you want the JDK you built to actually run, you will probably need to get the new msvcr*dll files placed in the jdk image area (in the bin dirs), manually or via the makefiles. I also vaguely recall some silly thi

Re: Somewhat wonkier Windows problem

2013-05-22 Thread David Chase
I hope I'm trying to solve a simpler problem, which is just a build, as if I were someone outside Oracle playing with Openjdk. I assume my problems are a subset of the release problem. David On 2013-05-22, at 6:53 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote: > Windows VS compilers are a pain. Each release has it

Re: Somewhat wonkier Windows problem

2013-05-22 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Windows VS compilers are a pain. Each release has it's own unique runtime DLLs, which we must deliver with the JDK, so the build process has to know what that DLL is named, where it is located, and copy it into various places. DLLs created by a newer VS will not like the older VS runtime DLLs.

Somewhat wonkier Windows problem

2013-05-22 Thread David Chase
I am persisting in my attempt to compile OpenJDK 8 on Windows 7, using the tools likely to be handy for someone outside Oracle attempting to do this, because our existing directions are borken and need to be fixed, if possible. I'm using VS2012, because that's what someone would normally do in 2

hg: jdk8/build/jdk: 2 new changesets

2013-05-22 Thread erik . joelsson
Changeset: 88d6a20672ac Author:erikj Date: 2013-05-22 10:31 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/88d6a20672ac 8014970: Use open man pages for non commercial builds Reviewed-by: omajid, tbell ! makefiles/Images.gmk Changeset: 169451cf0cc5 Author:erikj Date:

hg: jdk8/build/jdk: 8015087: Provide debugging information for programs

2013-05-22 Thread ahughes
Changeset: f559fadbf491 Author:andrew Date: 2013-05-22 13:48 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/f559fadbf491 8015087: Provide debugging information for programs Summary: Add missing debug info to unpack200 and jexec Reviewed-by: erikj ! makefiles/CompileLaunch

Re: [PATCH] Provide debugging information for programs

2013-05-22 Thread Andrew Hughes
- Original Message - > This looks good to me. > > 8015087: Provide debugging information for programs > > /Erik > Thanks. Pushed: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/cb51fb4789ac http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/f559fadbf491 > On 2013-05-21 20:31, Andrew Hughes wro

hg: jdk8/build: 8015087: Provide debugging information for programs

2013-05-22 Thread ahughes
Changeset: cb51fb4789ac Author:andrew Date: 2013-05-22 13:49 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/cb51fb4789ac 8015087: Provide debugging information for programs Summary: Enable debugging info on programs in OpenJDK builds Reviewed-by: erikj ! common/makefiles/Nati

Re: BUILD_JOBJC woes on Mac

2013-05-22 Thread Alan Bateman
On 22/05/2013 05:20, David Holmes wrote: On 21/05/2013 9:50 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Looks good to me. So has a bug been filed yet? :) I think some further investigation is still needed because gensrc_jobjc is being used in some places and not others and I'd want to verify they are all supp

Re: BUILD_JOBJC woes on Mac

2013-05-22 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2013-05-22 06:20, David Holmes wrote: On 21/05/2013 9:50 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Looks good to me. So has a bug been filed yet? :) I think some further investigation is still needed because gensrc_jobjc is being used in some places and not others and I'd want to verify they are all su

Re: Disable overrides during jdk build

2013-05-22 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2013-05-21 22:49, Andrew Hughes wrote: - Original Message - On 13/05/2013 15:24, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: I think it makes sense, esp. if the messages appear to be redundant. The compiler logic is very strict and there are cases where it comes down to guessing user intent and com

Re: [PATCH] Provide debugging information for programs

2013-05-22 Thread Erik Joelsson
This looks good to me. 8015087: Provide debugging information for programs /Erik On 2013-05-21 20:31, Andrew Hughes wrote: Hi all, The following webrevs: Root: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/build/debugging/webrev.02/ JDK: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/build/debugging/webrev.03/ 1.