+1
On 10/23/2014 4:52 AM, Naoto Sato wrote:
Hi Mandy,
As I wrote in a separate email, my preference is the following module
names:
jdk.localedata.jre
jdk.localedata.cldr
This way, they both come under "localedata" (btw, they don't provide
Locale, but the data for locale sensitive services
On 23/10/2014 12:05 AM, Turner, Randy wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if it was possible to build a "minimal" OpenJDK VM that would
fit into an embedded space...basically the equivalent of the Oracle Java ME 8 product ?
Basically, the build would implement the complete Java 8 language, and would i
Hi Mandy,
As I wrote in a separate email, my preference is the following module names:
jdk.localedata.jre
jdk.localedata.cldr
This way, they both come under "localedata" (btw, they don't provide
Locale, but the data for locale sensitive services such as DateFormat,
so I prefer to keep "locale
On 10/20/2014 5:25 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:
My motive for the question is the naming because the changes mean we
have jdk.localedata and jdk.localedata.cldr, an arrangement that
suggests that the CLDR locale data augments the jdk.localedata module.
It may be that we need to choose more suitable
Well, I take that back. Tried installing 2.7.5 just in case, and now it works
fine.
Summary:
- Yosemite installer breaks XQuartz configuration (probably something trivial
like removing a symbolic link)
- OpenJDK build is not compatible with XQuartz 2.7.7 (probably something
trivial like a file
I'm pretty sure I had XQuartz 2.7.5 installed when I started, and only
installed 2.7.7 as an attempt to address the failure.
—Dan
> On Oct 22, 2014, at 5:52 AM, Bernhard Urban wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> I had some problems building JDK8 on Mavericks regarding freetype. My
> solution was to use
Hi,
I was wondering if it was possible to build a "minimal" OpenJDK VM that would
fit into an embedded space...basically the equivalent of the Oracle Java ME 8
product ? Basically, the build would implement the complete Java 8 language,
and would include support for a very small set of librari
Hi Dan,
I had some problems building JDK8 on Mavericks regarding freetype. My
solution was to use XQuartz 2.7.5 (instead of 2.7.7), maybe it's worth a
try.
-Bernhard
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
> Looks like I'm a little bit too close to the bleeding edge, but I wonder
TFT Erik ,
I rather thought that would be the case - I know that I've previously
raised defects against the build system, but can't find the means by which
I did so (as I don't now and didn't then, have an OJDK login).
Rgds ,
--
Dave Pointon FIAP MBCS
Now I saw, tho' too late, the folly of begi
Hello Dave,
The category named by David refers to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net,
which is the actual bug database for OpenJDK. It requires an OpenJDK
login to submit bugs. I'm not familiar with the public bug submission
system, but I would expect it to be rather limited.
/Erik
On 2014-10-22
TFT David ,
I'm afraid to say that I wouldn't have asked if a choice so obvious was
available to me on/at http://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/submit_intro.do -
all the of choices that I see are language/platform i.e.
non-infrastructure/build, related.
Rgds ,
--
Dave Pointon FIAP MBCS
Now I saw,
11 matches
Mail list logo