Looks OK to me. I've added 2d-dev (owner of the lib).
I don't think this will cause any issue for closed builds but we'll
address it if it does.
-phil.
On 5/28/15 7:25 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8081447
Webrev: http://c
- Original Message -
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8081447
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/8081447/webrev.01/
>
> In testing a fix for [0], I found that system jpeg support seems
> to have bitrotted. Due to the movement of makefiles, it's hard
> to trace wher
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8081447
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/8081447/webrev.01/
In testing a fix for [0], I found that system jpeg support seems
to have bitrotted. Due to the movement of makefiles, it's hard
to trace where this change occurred, but we have the c
> On May 25, 2015, at 2:38 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>
> On 2015-05-22 17:47, Dan Smith wrote:
>> JDK-8027584 disabled ccache by default, I gather because it doesn't work in
>> Cygwin, and secondarily because of vague general problems with it.
>>
>> The documentation (README-builds.html) still u
Please find comments in line...
On 5/27/2015 3:42 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Valerie,
Did you see my comment yesterday?
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-May/012254.html
Yes, we exchanged emails after this above one. I will follow up your
latest one later today.
Sin
Hi,
due to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8081381 I wasn't able to
push this fix. The problem is LingeredApp.java contains JDK 9 feature
java.lang.Process.getPid() but the test library is compiled with JDK 8
today. This issue is not trivial to solve so I suggest a temporary fix
to t
On 27/05/2015 23:42, Mandy Chung wrote:
Valerie,
Did you see my comment yesterday?
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-May/012254.html
Since you have reverted the java.security to keep the classname, to avoid
causing merge conflict to jimage refresh, let’s remove the M