On 2015-06-03 19:14, Dan Smith wrote:
My understanding is that given a properly configured 'dist-clean' will behave
as noted:
rm -r build
sh configure
make dist-clean
find build -mindepth 1
# no output
However, instead I get 3 files:
build/macosx-x86_64-normal-server-release
Joe,
These lines in langtools/test/TEST.groups look like they belong, with
appropriate tweaking, in langtools/test/Makefile
37 # Support for invoking tiered testing via the Makefile
38 #langtools_tier1 = :tier1
39 #langtools_tier2 = :tier2
40 #langtools_tier3 = :tier3
Or more
On 2/06/2015 11:50 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 15:21, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Hate to disturb you again but I got yet another show stopper for my
Solaris build:
Generating solaris_amd64_docs/jvmti.html
Creating libverify.so from 2 file(s)
Creating libjava.so from 60
On 6/3/2015 11:28 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 17:27, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build jdk9 under the current Solaris 11.2 version.
Which version of the Solaris Studio should be installed for that? The
readme-builds states:
...
At a minimum, the Studio 12 Update
On 2015-06-02 18:50, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Hello Eric,
Thanks for the change, this seems definitely better to me. I've folded
your change that into my patch. An updated version (just langtools
this time):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/8072480/webrev.04/langtools/
Thanks!
From a build
On 2015-06-02 17:27, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build jdk9 under the current Solaris 11.2 version.
Which version of the Solaris Studio should be installed for that? The
readme-builds states:
...
At a minimum, the Studio 12 Update 1 Compilers (containing version
5.10 of the C
Magnus:
Looks good to me as well.
Tim
On 06/03/15 06:12, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2015-06-03 14:33, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Not all versions of gcc support -fstack-protector. We should check
that it is accepted as an argument before adding it to the flags.
Bug:
Not all versions of gcc support -fstack-protector. We should check that
it is accepted as an argument before adding it to the flags.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8081692
WebRev inline:
diff --git a/common/autoconf/flags.m4 b/common/autoconf/flags.m4
---
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2015-06-03 14:33, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Not all versions of gcc support -fstack-protector. We should check
that it is accepted as an argument before adding it to the flags.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8081692
WebRev inline:
diff --git
My understanding is that given a properly configured 'dist-clean' will behave
as noted:
rm -r build
sh configure
make dist-clean
find build -mindepth 1
# no output
However, instead I get 3 files:
build/macosx-x86_64-normal-server-release
build/macosx-x86_64-normal-server-release/build.log
On 4/06/2015 12:33 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
On 6/3/15 8:43 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
Cross posting to build-dev for possible insight regarding Jon's last
paragraph below.
On 6/3/15 8:13 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On 06/03/2015 04:27 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
Hi, As part of my test I need to build
Magnus,
You missed the hotspot side of this:
./solaris/makefiles/gcc.make: DEBUG_CFLAGS += -fstack-protector-all
--param ssp-buffer-size=1
./bsd/makefiles/gcc.make:DEBUG_CFLAGS += -fstack-protector-all
--param ssp-buffer-size=1
./linux/makefiles/gcc.make:DEBUG_CFLAGS +=
On 6/3/15 8:43 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
Cross posting to build-dev for possible insight regarding Jon's last
paragraph below.
On 6/3/15 8:13 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On 06/03/2015 04:27 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
Hi, As part of my test I need to build a simple DLL and then load it
from my
Peter,
On 4/06/2015 11:43 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
Cross posting to build-dev for possible insight regarding Jon's last
paragraph below.
See jdk/make/test/JtregNative.gmk and other references to test-image.
David
On 6/3/15 8:13 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On 06/03/2015 04:27 PM, Pete
Cross posting to build-dev for possible insight regarding Jon's last
paragraph below.
On 6/3/15 8:13 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On 06/03/2015 04:27 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
Hi, As part of my test I need to build a simple DLL and then load it
from my test class. Can jtreg build the DLL or will
Correct, if the makefile related changes are removed then no need for
build team to review 7191662 webrev anymore.
There are other discussions ongoing and we should be able to reach a
decision in a day or two.
Will update the list again.
Thanks,
Valerie
On 06/01/15 16:39, Magnus Ihse Bursie
16 matches
Mail list logo