Re: What to pass to --with-custom-make-dir?

2017-03-03 Thread David Holmes
Hi Christian, I think you need to pass an absolute directory, in which all the custom files, regardless of repo, are located. That is essentially how we use it - jdk/make/closed has files included from other repos. Of course that only works if names are unique. David On 4/03/2017 9:11 AM, R

Re: What to pass to --with-custom-make-dir?

2017-03-03 Thread Rob McKenna
Hi Christian, I'm cc'ing build-dev (and bcc'ing jdk8u-dev) as that may be a more appropriate venue for this discussion. -Rob On 03/03/17 10:19, Christian Thalinger wrote: > At Twitter we are using the custom extension mechanism to separate our > additional code from upstream in order to min

Re: RFR: 8173801 Modify makefiles to not build demos and samples bundles.

2017-03-03 Thread Alexandre (Shura) Iline
Creating some other makefiles was not planned as a part of this JEP, Phil. If the demos are used for testing, do you want me do turn them into manual tests? Shura > On Mar 3, 2017, at 2:45 PM, Phil Race wrote: > > And to be clear, the provision for still building these client demos needs to

Re: RFR: 8173801 Modify makefiles to not build demos and samples bundles.

2017-03-03 Thread Phil Race
And to be clear, the provision for still building these client demos needs to be made BEFORE this is pushed. Or at least as *part* of this push. Else we will be unable to perform our normal integration testing at this critical juncture of JDK 9 .. -phil. On 03/03/2017 09:39 AM, Phil Race wrot

Re: RFR: 8173801 Modify makefiles to not build demos and samples bundles.

2017-03-03 Thread Phil Race
What is the plan for ensuring there is still a way to build the client demos - which are not being removed but just moved. Doesn't this makefile need to be somewhere still ? -phil. On 3/3/2017 12:18 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2017-03-02 20:33, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote: Hi, Could y

Re: RFR: JDK-8176084 Developer-friendly run-test facility

2017-03-03 Thread Erik Joelsson
Looks good to me now. /Erik On 2017-03-03 10:39, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: I have an updated webrev. Here is a differential webrev showing the changes compared to the previous webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8176084-introduce-run-test/webrev.02 And here is a full webrev showin

Re: RFR: JDK-8176084 Developer-friendly run-test facility

2017-03-03 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
I have an updated webrev. Here is a differential webrev showing the changes compared to the previous webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8176084-introduce-run-test/webrev.02 And here is a full webrev showing all changes: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8176084-introduce-run-test/

Re: RFR: 8173801 Modify makefiles to not build demos and samples bundles.

2017-03-03 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2017-03-02 20:33, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote: Hi, Could you be so kind to review suggested changes for the makefiles to stop producing sales and demos bundle. Pls note that this request only changes the makefiles, it does not remove demos and samples source code, which will be done sepa