Re: RFR: JDK-8182733 aarch64 build documentation misleading

2018-08-01 Thread David Holmes
On 2/08/2018 4:18 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2018-08-01 18:46, David Holmes wrote: Hi Magnus, On 2/08/2018 11:40 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: The build documentation misleadingly states that it is not recommended to build without cross compilation on aarch64. This patch updates the d

Re: RFR: JDK-8182733 aarch64 build documentation misleading

2018-08-01 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2018-08-01 18:46, David Holmes wrote: Hi Magnus, On 2/08/2018 11:40 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: The build documentation misleadingly states that it is not recommended to build without cross compilation on aarch64. This patch updates the documentation. (I apologize for taking so long to

Re: RFR(XXS) : 8208647 : switch jtreg to 4.2b13

2018-08-01 Thread David Holmes
On 2/08/2018 3:39 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote: On Aug 1, 2018, at 10:33 PM, David Holmes wrote: Hi Igor, On 2/08/2018 5:42 AM, Igor Ignatyev wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/8208647/webrev.00/index.html 5 lines changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 5 mod; Hi all, could you please review this sm

Re: RFR(XXS) : 8208647 : switch jtreg to 4.2b13

2018-08-01 Thread Igor Ignatyev
> On Aug 1, 2018, at 10:33 PM, David Holmes wrote: > > Hi Igor, > > On 2/08/2018 5:42 AM, Igor Ignatyev wrote: >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/8208647/webrev.00/index.html >>> 5 lines changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 5 mod; >> Hi all, >> could you please review this small fix which switches jt

Re: RFR(XXS) : 8208647 : switch jtreg to 4.2b13

2018-08-01 Thread David Holmes
Hi Igor, On 2/08/2018 5:42 AM, Igor Ignatyev wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/8208647/webrev.00/index.html 5 lines changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 5 mod; Hi all, could you please review this small fix which switches jtreg to the latest available build? Okay. due to changes in javates

Re: RFR: JDK-8182733 aarch64 build documentation misleading

2018-08-01 Thread David Holmes
Hi Magnus, On 2/08/2018 11:40 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: The build documentation misleadingly states that it is not recommended to build without cross compilation on aarch64. This patch updates the documentation. (I apologize for taking so long to address this. :-() Bug: https://bugs.openj

RFR: JDK-8182733 aarch64 build documentation misleading

2018-08-01 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
The build documentation misleadingly states that it is not recommended to build without cross compilation on aarch64. This patch updates the documentation. (I apologize for taking so long to address this. :-() Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8182733 WebRev: http://cr.openjdk.java

Re: RFR(XXS) : 8208647 : switch jtreg to 4.2b13

2018-08-01 Thread Vladimir Kozlov
Good. Vladimir On 8/1/18 12:42 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/8208647/webrev.00/index.html 5 lines changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 5 mod; Hi all, could you please review this small fix which switches jtreg to the latest available build? due to changes in javatest API

Re: RFR(XXS) : 8208647 : switch jtreg to 4.2b13

2018-08-01 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2018-08-01 12:42, Igor Ignatyev wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/8208647/webrev.00/index.html 5 lines changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 5 mod; Hi all, could you please review this small fix which switches jtreg to the latest available build? due to changes in javatest API, failure_handler

RFR(XXS) : 8208647 : switch jtreg to 4.2b13

2018-08-01 Thread Igor Ignatyev
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/8208647/webrev.00/index.html > 5 lines changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 5 mod; Hi all, could you please review this small fix which switches jtreg to the latest available build? due to changes in javatest API, failure_handler had to be slightly updated. webrev: http