On 26/06/2019 14:02, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 13:04 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> On 25/06/2019 10:04, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Could somebody please review this 8u backport? The build system in 8 is
>>> different, especially hotspot makefiles. Note,
Vote: yes
Tim
On 06/26/19 01:29, Volker Simonis wrote:
I hereby nominate Matthias Baesken (mbaesken) to Membership in the Build Group.
> Here you go:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-
> 8210761/jdk8/02/webrev/
>
> I cannot really test on bsd, solaris or aix, though :( Appreciate any
> testers for those platforms.
I pulled the patch into our test environment. It will be run for AIX and
solaris there. Will let y
On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 13:04 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> On 25/06/2019 10:04, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could somebody please review this 8u backport? The build system in 8 is
> > different, especially hotspot makefiles. Note, libjsig.so is part of
> > the hotspot build. The
Vote: yes
/Erik
On 2019-06-26 01:29, Volker Simonis wrote:
I hereby nominate Matthias Baesken (mbaesken) to Membership in the Build Group.
Matthias is a long standing member of the JVM team at SAP. He's main
areas of expertise are the build system, compilers/porting and
security updates. He's
> The 11u fix applies to all 'unix' platforms, as far as I can see. Should
> the 8u equivalent not also be applied to the solaris, bsd and aix
> subdirectories as well for consistency?
+1 We can test this for AIX.
Cheers
Christoph
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 2:27 PM Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 14:21 +0200, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> >
> > One curious question though about the original bug, was this really a
> > measurable performance issue? I would have thought that libjsig is
> > not invoked often enough for thi
On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 14:21 +0200, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>
> One curious question though about the original bug, was this really a
> measurable performance issue? I would have thought that libjsig is
> not invoked often enough for this to make a difference..
It's a matter of missed optimizations. W
I'd be okay with doing this on AIX if Christoph is.
One curious question though about the original bug, was this really a
measurable performance issue? I would have thought that libjsig is not
invoked often enough for this to make a difference..
Cheers, Thomas
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 2:05 PM A
On 25/06/2019 10:04, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could somebody please review this 8u backport? The build system in 8 is
> different, especially hotspot makefiles. Note, libjsig.so is part of
> the hotspot build. The patch is different in 8 (over 11) due to this
> reason. This is a Linux-o
Hi Christoph,
On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 18:14 +, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> Hi Severin,
>
> I think this is good.
Thanks for the review!
Cheers,
Severin
> Best regards
> Christoph
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: jdk8u-dev On Behalf Of
> > Severin Gehwolf
> > Sent: Dienstag, 25. Ju
I hereby nominate Matthias Baesken (mbaesken) to Membership in the Build Group.
Matthias is a long standing member of the JVM team at SAP. He's main
areas of expertise are the build system, compilers/porting and
security updates. He's a JDK Reviewer who has contributed more than
90 changes within
Vote: yes
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:29 AM Volker Simonis
wrote:
>
> I hereby nominate Matthias Baesken (mbaesken) to Membership in the Build
> Group.
>
> Matthias is a long standing member of the JVM team at SAP. He's main
> areas of expertise are the build system, compilers/porting and
> secur
13 matches
Mail list logo
