On 26/07/2019 16:53, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 14:46 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> On 25/07/2019 16:02, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>
>> snip...
>>
Done now. I've added fix-request comments/labels to the above bugs and
rebased on top of them. New
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 14:46 +0100, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 25/07/2019 16:02, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>
> snip...
>
> > > Done now. I've added fix-request comments/labels to the above bugs and
> > > rebased on top of them. New jdk changeset:
> > >
Gentle reminder.
/Erik
On 2019-06-20 10:39, Erik Joelsson wrote:
For both java and native source files, we have a feature in the build
which allows overriding based on file name for more specific version
(i.e. OS specific overrides shared). This works quite well and is used
in several
On 25/07/2019 16:02, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
snip...
>>
>> Done now. I've added fix-request comments/labels to the above bugs and
>> rebased on top of them. New jdk changeset:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8222737/04/jdk/webrev/
>>
>> Test groups definition is the JDK 9 set
On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 10:44 +0200, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 7/25/19 5:02 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Any more thoughts?
>
> I think we should go on with it. The lack of tier1 in jdk8u is a serious
> impediment for backports. I
> have applied all the recent patches (04/jdk, 03/hotspot,
On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 10:44 +0200, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 7/25/19 5:02 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Any more thoughts?
>
> I think we should go on with it. The lack of tier1 in jdk8u is a serious
> impediment for backports. I
> have applied all the recent patches (04/jdk, 03/hotspot,
On 7/25/19 5:02 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Any more thoughts?
I think we should go on with it. The lack of tier1 in jdk8u is a serious
impediment for backports. I
have applied all the recent patches (04/jdk, 03/hotspot, 03/langtools/ 02/top),
and tier1 works for
me. That is, it produces test
