On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:57:28 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> From a build perspective this partially reverts
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8249821 except that it keeps
>> the harfbuzz sources separate and still supports building and running
>> against a system harfbuzz which is only of
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:52:38 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> I was actually thinking that such a change would be simpler; more or less
> amounting to changing from LIBRARY to STATIC_LIBRARY. But if you feel that it
> is too much work, fine...
If you say so .. I have no idea what build changes
> From a build perspective this partially reverts
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8249821 except that it keeps
> the harfbuzz sources separate and still supports building and running against
> a system harfbuzz which is only of interest or relevance on Linux.
>
> I ended up having to
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 18:35:12 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> Phil Race has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8255790: GTKL&F: Java 16 crashes on initialising GTKL&F on Manjaro Linux
>
>> Just thinking out loud, you don't think it woul
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 05:49:53 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Anton Kozlov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 114 commits:
>>
>> - JDK-8262491: bsd_aarch64 part
>> - JDK-8263002: bsd_aarch64 part
>> - Merge remote-track
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:21:44 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> We always check for `R18_RESERVED` with `#if(n)def`, is there any reason to
>> define the value for the macro?
>
> Robustness, clarity, maintainability, convention. Why not?
I've tried to implement the suggestion, but it pulled more unnec
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:27:51 GMT, Stefan Karlsson wrote:
>> The thread_bsd_aarch64.hpp describes a part of JavaThread, while this block
>> belongs to Thread for now. Since W^X is an attribute of any operating system
>> thread, I assumed Thread to be the right place for W^X bookkeeping.
>>
>>
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 00:15:16 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> From a build perspective this partially reverts
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8249821 except that it keeps
> the harfbuzz sources separate and still supports building and running against
> a system harfbuzz which is only of inte
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:46:45 GMT, Alexander Zvegintsev
wrote:
>> From a build perspective this partially reverts
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8249821 except that it keeps
>> the harfbuzz sources separate and still supports building and running
>> against a system harfbuzz which
> Please review the implementation of JEP 391: macOS/AArch64 Port.
>
> It's heavily based on existing ports to linux/aarch64, macos/x86_64, and
> windows/aarch64.
>
> Major changes are in:
> * src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64: support of the new calling convention (subtasks
> JDK-8253817, JDK-8253818)
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 00:34:33 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> From a build perspective this partially reverts
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8249821 except that it keeps
>> the harfbuzz sources separate and still supports building and running
>> against a system harfbuzz which is on
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 00:15:16 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
> From a build perspective this partially reverts
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8249821 except that it keeps
> the harfbuzz sources separate and still supports building and running against
> a system harfbuzz which is only of inte
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 13:45:46 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
>> Need rebase
>
> Created new PR because of forced push:
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/1292
LGTM
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1273
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:36:34 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> I fixed some conversion logic within JDK-8256331.
>
> OK, just to confirm. I wrote that text for OGL because it was the fastest way
> to transfer+convert the data from the video card to the memory. And as far as
> I understand the meta
14 matches
Mail list logo
