The "missing-explicit-ctor" check was disabled by the
[JDK-8071961](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8071961) and later was
fixed by the [JDK-8250853](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250853).
So we can re-enable this check again.
The fix will remove the "Java.gmk" file and as
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 01:18:20 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> In JDK 18, JDK-8189591 added the ability to suppress doclint warnings.
> Therefore, it is now possible to enable the full doclint checks for the
> java.desktop module if the instances of warnings are suppressed. This patch
> does this; it wou
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 01:18:20 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> In JDK 18, JDK-8189591 added the ability to suppress doclint warnings.
> Therefore, it is now possible to enable the full doclint checks for the
> java.desktop module if the instances of warnings are suppressed. This patch
> does this; it wou
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 01:18:20 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> In JDK 18, JDK-8189591 added the ability to suppress doclint warnings.
> Therefore, it is now possible to enable the full doclint checks for the
> java.desktop module if the instances of warnings are suppressed. This patch
> does this; it wou
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 12:13:03 GMT, Andrew Leonard wrote:
>> Addition of a configure option --with-cacerts-src='user cacerts folder' to
>> allow developers to specify their own cacerts PEM folder for generation of
>> the cacerts store using the deterministic openjdk GenerateCacerts tool.
>>
>> Si
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 10:55:57 GMT, Andrew Leonard wrote:
> This is the case at Adoptium for example, which uses the Mozilla trusted CA
> certs.
But they didn't think skipping this test was too strong a step? For example
validation of the certs expiration is quite useful. I tried to update the te
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 03:28:46 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> An exploratory build indicates that it is not necessary to disable the
> accessibility doclint check for the java.naming module.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 780b8b10
Author:Joe Darcy
URL:
https://git.open
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 22:45:37 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> In JDK-8237858, -pthread was added to all native tests, instead of the one
> single test that needed it. In the meantime, two new tests with pthread
> dependencies has crept in unnoticed due to this.
This pull request has now been in
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 03:22:03 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> In JDK-8237858, -pthread was added to all native tests, instead of the one
>> single test that needed it. In the meantime, two new tests with pthread
>> dependencies has crept in unnoticed due to this.
>
> Looks good.
>
> I don't think `-
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 00:41:23 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Please review a patch to use snippets in the `java.compiler` documentation,
>> instead of a mix of raw HTML and/or `{@code ...}`. The change is just about
>> the presentation of the code fragments; there are no changes to the
>> no
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 03:28:46 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> An exploratory build indicates that it is not necessary to disable the
> accessibility doclint check for the java.naming module.
Marked as reviewed by erikj (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6688
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 22:45:37 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> In JDK-8237858, -pthread was added to all native tests, instead of the one
> single test that needed it. In the meantime, two new tests with pthread
> dependencies has crept in unnoticed due to this.
Marked as reviewed by erikj (Revi
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 01:18:20 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> In JDK 18, JDK-8189591 added the ability to suppress doclint warnings.
> Therefore, it is now possible to enable the full doclint checks for the
> java.desktop module if the instances of warnings are suppressed. This patch
> does this; it wou
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 21:07:30 GMT, Andrew Leonard wrote:
> PR https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/6647 resolved the GENDATA_CACERTS_SRC
> fir --with-cacerts-src after the recipe, which meant the dependencies were
> wrong.
> This PR moves it before the recipe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Leonard
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 00:26:10 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Please review a patch to use snippets in the `java.compiler` documentation,
> instead of a mix of raw HTML and/or `{@code ...}`. The change is just about
> the presentation of the code fragments; there are no changes to the normative
15 matches
Mail list logo
