Re: Openjdk build problem

2018-06-21 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Hi Constaninus See http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2018-June/022427.html for a work-around and the follow up issue raised to solve it correctly. -Patrick On 2018-06-21 10:03, pilot constatinus wrote: Hi, i recently tried to compile openjdk 9. Fedora x86_64 28 gcc 8.1.1. I

Re: JDK Build on Fedora 28

2018-06-19 Thread Patrick Reinhart
I went thru the remaining warnings, that show up when building under gcc 8.1.1 on Fedora 28: /home/rep/sources/jdk/src/jdk.jdwp.agent/share/native/libjdwp/debugInit.c: In function ‘jniFatalError’: /home/rep/sources/jdk/src/jdk.jdwp.agent/share/native/libjdwp/debugInit.c:650:24: warning:

Re: JDK Build on Fedora 28

2018-06-18 Thread Patrick Reinhart
from mobile, excuse my brevity. > >> On Jun 18, 2018, at 9:36 PM, Patrick Reinhart wrote: >> >> Hi everybody, >> >> Can anyone give me some advice in what I should do in order to build the >> OpenJDK on a Fedora 28? >> >> >> -Patrick

JDK Build on Fedora 28

2018-06-18 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Hi everybody, Can anyone give me some advice in what I should do in order to build the OpenJDK on a Fedora 28? -Patrick At the moment I get those errors: Compiling 5 files for jdk.internal.vm.compiler.management /home/pr/sources/jdk/src/hotspot/os/posix/os_posix.cpp: In static member

Re: Building latest jdk9 dev on Mac OS X 10.12.1 - Undefined symbols (_libiconv) causing build to fail?

2016-12-16 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Fantastic, I finally have build again :-) -Patrick > Am 16.12.2016 um 16:12 schrieb Martijn Verburg : > > Hi Michel, > > That helps actually - confirms that it's like my unique set up, a reverse > of the usual WFM! > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 at

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-19 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Hi Magnus, Did you had the time to check my back port jet? Is there anything I can do to help? It would greatly improve the Adopt OpenJDK program to also having the JDK 8 built in the same ease as the JDK 9. Best regards Patrick Am 17.11.2014 um 13:16 schrieb Patrick Reinhart patr

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-17 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Hi Magnus, Did you get the time to look into the patch already? Is there something I can do? Cheers Patrick

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-14 Thread Patrick Reinhart
patches first :-( It seems I’m stuck in a recursive loop somehow ;-) Cheers Patrick PS: I did already contributed two fixes for the 2d printing part in the past. Am 14.11.2014 um 09:01 schrieb David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com: On 14/11/2014 5:36 PM, Patrick Reinhart wrote

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-14 Thread Patrick Reinhart
...@oracle.com mailto:david.hol...@oracle.com: On 14/11/2014 5:36 PM, Patrick Reinhart wrote: An attachment in the email has been found to contain executable code and has been removed. File removed : webrev.zip, zip,html,js Unclear what removed the attachment. :( David

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-14 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Hi Erik / Magnus, See attachment… Patrick Am 14.11.2014 um 10:26 schrieb Erik Joelsson erik.joels...@oracle.com: Hello Patrick, try reverting common/autoconf/generated-configure before generating the patch. That file does not need to be reviewed as it's just generated anyway. That

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-14 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Here is the patch also as inlined text: --- old/common/autoconf/help.m4 2014-11-14 10:32:44.0 +0100 +++ new/common/autoconf/help.m4 2014-11-14 10:32:44.0 +0100 @@ -75,20 +75,18 @@ HELP_MSG=You might be able to fix this by running '$PKGHANDLER_COMMAND'. ;;

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-13 Thread Patrick Reinhart
://reinharts.dyndns.org/buildjdk8win/webrev/ http://reinharts.dyndns.org/buildjdk8win/webrev/ Cheers Patrick Am 13.11.2014 um 14:50 schrieb Magnus Ihse Bursie magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com: On 2014-11-12 19:34, Patrick Reinhart wrote: Hi there, I’m updating the Adopt OpenJDK website

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-13 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Hi David, So I should be able to attach the webrev.zip to the message for the mailing list? Cheers Patrick Am 14.11.2014 um 03:18 schrieb David Holmes david.hol...@oracle.com: Hi Patrick, On 14/11/2014 12:15 AM, Patrick Reinhart wrote: Hi Magnus, I actually merged down the freetype

RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-12 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Hi there, I’m updating the Adopt OpenJDK website with build instructions to build the OpenJDK on Windows 8.1. In order to lower the effort of building also the OpenJDK 8 on Windows, myself and some colleges have back ported the build scripts from OpenJDK 9. We also could provide a webrev

Re: Access denied on windows 7

2012-12-31 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Hi Boaz, Have you created the L2 directory within cygwin prior doing the check out? When creating the Adopt OpenJDK Windows Build Wiki (http://java.net/projects/adoptopenjdk/pages/BuildWindows) this solved the access problems. Cheers Patrick Am 30.12.12 21:53, schrieb Boaz Nahum: Some more

Re: alsa-sane-headers sanity check broken

2010-11-22 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Am 22.11.10 22:09, schrieb Dr Andrew John Hughes: I'm quite puzzled as to how this hasn't been spotted before now, but I tried to build jdk7/jdk7 today (b118 from hg), using exactly the same script as I usually do, and immediately failed due to a missing separator in the jdk Sanity.gmk Makefile:

Re: Building OpenJDK 7 under Fedora 14'

2010-11-20 Thread Patrick Reinhart
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 10:37 +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: How do I specify those suggested ANT parameters with the make command? export ALLOW_DOWNLOADS=true This would work if the SSL certificate for the used server, would be correct and not being issued for www.java.net ... :-(