Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hi Kelly,
On 07/31/2008 10:58 PM Kelly O'Hair wrote:
So no plugin code, no installation bundle code, etc.
Right. But all the currently opensourced code was buildable at that
time.
From this point it was clean: VS2005ExpressSP1 + Platform SDK for
Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hi Kelly,
On 07/31/2008 10:58 PM Kelly O'Hair wrote:
So no plugin code, no installation bundle code, etc.
Right. But all the currently opensourced code was buildable at that time.
From this point it was clean: VS2005ExpressSP1 + Platform SDK for
Win2003R2 + DirectX S
Hi Kelly,
On 07/31/2008 10:58 PM Kelly O'Hair wrote:
So no plugin code, no installation bundle code, etc.
Right. But all the currently opensourced code was buildable at that time.
From this point it was clean: VS2005ExpressSP1 + Platform SDK for
Win2003R2 + DirectX SDK June 2007 + cygwin. No
Anthony Petrov wrote:
On 7/31/2008 7:14 PM Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Define "complete Hotspot and J2SE code".
Just OpenJDK?
Was this the JRL or full Sun JDK sources?
Just hotspot and j2se (or now called "jdk") directories?
These were old-good j2se and hotspot workspaces back in June 2007.
So no p
On 7/31/2008 7:14 PM Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Define "complete Hotspot and J2SE code".
Just OpenJDK?
Was this the JRL or full Sun JDK sources?
Just hotspot and j2se (or now called "jdk") directories?
These were old-good j2se and hotspot workspaces back in June 2007.
Just installing an Express compi
Define "complete Hotspot and J2SE code".
Just OpenJDK?
Was this the JRL or full Sun JDK sources?
Just hotspot and j2se (or now called "jdk") directories?
Just installing an Express compiler and using it doesn't mean that
during the build the Professional files installed on the machine
are not use
On Jul 31, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
About a year ago I did build the complete Hotspot and J2SE code
using VS2005 Express + MS Platform SDK + DirectX SDK - all
downloaded for free from the Microsoft web-site. During building I
identified some bugs (to name a few: 6486546, 648
On 07/30/2008 07:56 PM Erik Trimble wrote:
would make it very nice. Unfortunately, the free version of VS is
actually _very_ different than the Professional version, and not just
the compiler itself (which, has a whole 'nother set of bugs unique to
it...).
AFAIK, that was true for the free ver
About a year ago I did build the complete Hotspot and J2SE code using
VS2005 Express + MS Platform SDK + DirectX SDK - all downloaded for free
from the Microsoft web-site. During building I identified some bugs (to
name a few: 6486546, 6488751, 6523947). Some of them belonging to the
J2SE code
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Phil's understanding is also mine.
I don't doubt that at some time in the future these two products might
be different builds, due to patches and so forth, but as I read all the
web pages, they should be in fact the same actual compiler and optimizer.
It's some of the fluff a
Phil's understanding is also mine.
I don't doubt that at some time in the future these two products might
be different builds, due to patches and so forth, but as I read all the
web pages, they should be in fact the same actual compiler and optimizer.
It's some of the fluff around the edges that
Erik Trimble wrote:
I know there's been a lot of exploration on this topic, as yes, being
able to use just the free MS SDK and the free Visual Studio versions
would make it very nice. Unfortunately, the free version of VS is
actually _very_ different than the Professional version, and not ju
We are focusing on the Professional edition first because the free
Express edition does not include the ATL include or lib files.
I'm not an ATL expert, but JDK builds have a dependence on it and it's
probably not going away for quite some time I'm told.
It's quite possible that much of the Open
Anthony Petrov wrote:
On 07/29/2008 11:03 PM Erik Trimble wrote:
I certainly can't speak for Sun on this. But, I don't think there is
any immediate plans to use GCC on Windows. It would probably be OK if
someone wanted to try, but I can't imagine it being even remotely
easy. There's just so
On 07/29/2008 11:03 PM Erik Trimble wrote:
I certainly can't speak for Sun on this. But, I don't think there is
any immediate plans to use GCC on Windows. It would probably be OK if
someone wanted to try, but I can't imagine it being even remotely easy.
There's just so much stuff dependent on
Porting OpenJDK to be an actual cygwin program,
rather than just being built using cygwin tools,
is an obvious target for open source porters.
The cygwinized OpenJDK would be available as part of the Cygwin
distribution. Obviously a porter would have to fight with
many assumptions currently being
Erik Trimble wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Erik Trimble wrote:
Also, Cygwin is the UNIX-ism platform of choice, and getting the JDK
to build solely with Cygwin (on both 32- and 64-bit, Win2k, WinXP,
and Win2003) would be a _huge_ deal.
I.e. using the gcc provided by Cygwin and the 'posixy' lib
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Erik Trimble wrote:
Also, Cygwin is the UNIX-ism platform of choice, and getting the JDK
to build solely with Cygwin (on both 32- and 64-bit, Win2k, WinXP,
and Win2003) would be a _huge_ deal.
I.e. using the gcc provided by Cygwin and the 'posixy' libc it provides?
cheer
That would be interesting, but a very big rock.
---
I'm remembering a seminar I took a long time ago, the same one that
Harvey is talking about here:
http://www.harveymackay.com/columns/best/11.cfm
Although I remember it being a bucket, not a jar.
You need to put the big rocks in the bucket f
Erik Trimble wrote:
Also, Cygwin is the UNIX-ism platform of choice, and getting the JDK
to build solely with Cygwin (on both 32- and 64-bit, Win2k, WinXP, and
Win2003) would be a _huge_ deal.
I.e. using the gcc provided by Cygwin and the 'posixy' libc it provides?
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
*
Erik Trimble wrote:
As a followup to this: we're looking at moving to Windows XP w/ VS.Net
2008 as the new default Windows 32-bit build platform. Windows 2003 is
likely to remain the 64-bit Windows platform for quite some time. I do
expect that we will want to update the MS SDK on both
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I see no reason to build on Win 2008. Yes, someday it should work, but
anything you build is suspect because the official JDK7 builds will
eventually be done on Windows XP.
You could end up tracking down problems that are unique to building on
Win 2008 and have no val
I see no reason to build on Win 2008. Yes, someday it should work, but
anything you build is suspect because the official JDK7 builds will
eventually be done on Windows XP.
You could end up tracking down problems that are unique to building on
Win 2008 and have no value to the official JDK7
Hi All
Just install Win 2008 and VS.NET 2008 this afternoon and try to build
JDK. There're 2 tiny issues:
1. cl.exe's version is 15., not recognized by Compiler-msvc.gmk.
Duplicate the MS.NET 2003 lines in the file to accept 15.
2. MSVCDIR is not defined in VS.NET 2008's vcvars.bat. I
24 matches
Mail list logo
