On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:38, Joe Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The source bundle for OpenJDK 6 build 14 is available for download from:
>
>http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/
The new Hotspot 11 failed to compile on a modified 64-bit (debian arch=amd64)
Ubuntu dapper system as follows:
I am looking into these failures and trying to fix these now on the
latest ubuntu 8.10 installation. The gcc/g++ is 4.3.2.
-Xiaobin
Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:38, Joe Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The source bundle for OpenJDK 6 build 14 is available for download f
Martin Buchholz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:38, Joe Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The source bundle for OpenJDK 6 build 14 is available for download from:
>>
>>http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/
>
> The new Hotspot 11 failed to compile on a modified 64-bit (debian arch=amd64)
Andrew Haley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Martin Buchholz wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:38, Joe Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The source bundle for OpenJDK 6 build 14 is available for download from:
> >>
> >>http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/
> >
> > The new Hotspot 11 faile
John Coomes wrote:
Andrew Haley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:38, Joe Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The source bundle for OpenJDK 6 build 14 is available for download from:
http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/
The
Hi John,
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 10:53 -0800, John Coomes wrote:
> > > 32-bit systems are unaffected (not sure why).
> >
> > It's a bug. The code is basically this:
> > ...
>
> This is http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6679422. FWIW, the
> trivial fix is in jdk7:
>
> http://hg.openjd
Mark Wielaard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 10:53 -0800, John Coomes wrote:
> > > > 32-bit systems are unaffected (not sure why).
> > >
> > > It's a bug. The code is basically this:
> > > ...
> >
> > This is http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6679422. FWIW
John Coomes wrote:
> Mark Wielaard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 10:53 -0800, John Coomes wrote:
> 32-bit systems are unaffected (not sure why).
It's a bug. The code is basically this:
...
>>> This is http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6679422