> On Feb 2, 2017, at 4:37 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> Hi Mandy,
>
> On 02/02/17 02:41, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8173607/webrev.06
>>
>> Does java.management still depend on java.base/jdk.internal.module?
>
> Well spotted! It doesn't. I have updated modu
Hi Mandy,
On 02/02/17 02:41, Mandy Chung wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8173607/webrev.06
Does java.management still depend on java.base/jdk.internal.module?
Well spotted! It doesn't. I have updated module-info.java for java.base.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_
> On Feb 1, 2017, at 7:29 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> Here is the updated webrev, rebased after pulling JDK-8173608, and with
> your feedback below integrated.
>
> I am pleased to report that java.management no longer requires
> java.rmi or java.naming :-)
>
This is great!
> Compared to prev
Hi Mandy,
On 01/02/17 05:11, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jan 31, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi,
Please find below a patch for:
8173607: JMX RMI connector should be in its own module
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173607
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_81
Build changes look ok.
/Erik
On 2017-01-31 19:26, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi,
Please find below a patch for:
8173607: JMX RMI connector should be in its own module
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173607
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8173607/webrev.05
This patch ma
> On Jan 31, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please find below a patch for:
>
> 8173607: JMX RMI connector should be in its own module
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173607
>
> webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8173607/webrev.05
>
This mostl
Hi,
Please find below a patch for:
8173607: JMX RMI connector should be in its own module
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173607
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8173607/webrev.05
This patch makes it possible to remove the requires transitive
java.rmi from the java.m