Thanks, looks much better to me at least.
/Erik
On 2015-02-06 11:57, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-02-05 12:44, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Looks good to me, but if it's possible, please split that huge echo
line. Adding a $$(strip ) will likely remove any extra white space
introduced by the spl
On 2015-02-05 12:44, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Looks good to me, but if it's possible, please split that huge echo
line. Adding a $$(strip ) will likely remove any extra white space
introduced by the split and indentation.
I'm not sure it's much clearer. :-) However, the lines are indeed
shorter,
Looks good to me, but if it's possible, please split that huge echo
line. Adding a $$(strip ) will likely remove any extra white space
introduced by the split and indentation.
/Erik
On 2015-02-04 13:23, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-02-04 02:28, David Holmes wrote:
On 3/02/2015 11:25 PM,
On 4/02/2015 10:23 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-02-04 02:28, David Holmes wrote:
On 3/02/2015 11:25 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-02-02 23:14, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
On 3/02/2015 1:51 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
When a header file is deleted, make will complain "No
On 2015-02-04 02:28, David Holmes wrote:
On 3/02/2015 11:25 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-02-02 23:14, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
On 3/02/2015 1:51 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
When a header file is deleted, make will complain "No rule to make
target ". This often breaks incremen
On 3/02/2015 11:25 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-02-02 23:14, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
On 3/02/2015 1:51 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
When a header file is deleted, make will complain "No rule to make
target ". This often breaks incremental build
completely unnecessary.
When/w
On 2015-02-02 23:14, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
On 3/02/2015 1:51 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
When a header file is deleted, make will complain "No rule to make
target ". This often breaks incremental build
completely unnecessary.
When/why would a header file be deleted?
Because it is
Hiya David ,
Like you, I don't understand why a header file might be deleted following
compilation but I can 'sort of' understand why it might not actually be
needed following that compilation. Having said that, it makes no sense that
a header file required for the initial compilation would not be
Hi Magnus,
On 3/02/2015 1:51 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
When a header file is deleted, make will complain "No rule to make
target ". This often breaks incremental build
completely unnecessary.
When/why would a header file be deleted?
There's one typo "dependeny" but I can't comment on the
When a header file is deleted, make will complain "No rule to make
target ". This often breaks incremental build
completely unnecessary.
This can be fixed by adding dummy rules for all header files like this:
:
gcc can create such rules by itself by using -MP in the generated make
dependency
10 matches
Mail list logo
