Hello,
A general comment on CSR filing, writing a CSR and getting it reviewed
and approved is not necessarily a large amount of work or high-latency.
Many small requests are approved the same day they are finalized.
I'm happy to answer questions about CSRs, including on whether or not
one ne
2018/8/21 7:25:58 -0700, volker.simo...@gmail.com:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:14 PM, magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> I can easily add a new make target to build hsdis.
>>
>> Adding a new binary to the OpenJDK images will require a CSR.
>
> Do we really need a CSR for hsdis? h
2018/8/21 11:11:00 -0700, john.r.r...@oracle.com:
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 9:41 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 08/21/2018 11:14 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>> Am I correct in understanding that there are no more legal barriers
>>> towards doing such a thing anymore?
>>
>> You'd still be linking G
On Aug 21, 2018, at 9:41 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> On 08/21/2018 11:14 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Am I correct in understanding that there are no more legal barriers
>> towards doing such a thing anymore?
>
> You'd still be linking GPLv2-only code (libjvm) against GPLv3-or-later
> code
On 08/21/2018 11:14 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Am I correct in understanding that there are no more legal barriers
> towards doing such a thing anymore?
You'd still be linking GPLv2-only code (libjvm) against GPLv3-or-later
code (binutils). IANAL, but I suspect you can't get around the GPLv
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:14 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
>
>> Yes, please. And it would be absolutely fantastic to actually build it and
>> ship it in default
>> OpenJDK images :)
>
>
> Am I correct in understanding that there are no more legal barriers towards
> doing such a thing anymore?
>
>
On 08/21/2018 12:14 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Yes, please. And it would be absolutely fantastic to actually build it and
>> ship it in default
>> OpenJDK images :)
>
> Am I correct in understanding that there are no more legal barriers towards
> doing such a thing anymore?
>
> I can easi
On 2018-08-21 12:14, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Yes, please. And it would be absolutely fantastic to actually build
it and ship it in default
OpenJDK images :)
Am I correct in understanding that there are no more legal barriers
towards doing such a thing anymore?
I can easily add a new
Yes, please. And it would be absolutely fantastic to actually build it and ship
it in default
OpenJDK images :)
Am I correct in understanding that there are no more legal barriers
towards doing such a thing anymore?
I can easily add a new make target to build hsdis.
Adding a new binary t
On 08/21/2018 11:58 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Now that hsdis has a more permissive license, would it make sense to include
> the build of hsdis in
> the rest of the OpenJDK build system, instead of having a separate Makefile?
Yes, please. And it would be absolutely fantastic to actually bui
Now that hsdis has a more permissive license, would it make sense to
include the build of hsdis in the rest of the OpenJDK build system,
instead of having a separate Makefile?
/Magnus
On 2018-07-25 14:59, David Buck wrote:
Hi!
Please approve this license change for the HSDIS plugin source co
11 matches
Mail list logo
