Yes, we do, if you don't mind.
/Erik
On 2016-04-02 13:38, Filipp Zhinkin wrote:
Hi Erik, thanks for reply.
Do we need a JBS's ticket to track this issue?
Thanks,
Filipp.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
It seems the test is indeed incorrect at this point. When I added
Hi Erik, thanks for reply.
Do we need a JBS's ticket to track this issue?
Thanks,
Filipp.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> It seems the test is indeed incorrect at this point. When I added that test,
> the launcher would accept just -Xpatch:. It seems to now accept -Xpatc
Hi Alan,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
> Are you sure your boot JDK is jdk-9+111? If it doesn't support -Xpatch then
> it's probably older build.
Yes, it's was a jdk-9+111 and as Erik said it seems to be an issue
with test performed to detect modules support.
>
> In any
It seems the test is indeed incorrect at this point. When I added that
test, the launcher would accept just -Xpatch:. It seems to now accept
-Xpatch:foo so perhaps we should use that for the test.
/Erik
On 2016-03-31 09:56, Filipp Zhinkin wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to build OpenJDK from lates
Are you sure your boot JDK is jdk-9+111? If it doesn't support -Xpatch
then it's probably older build.
In any case, the boot JDK should be JDK 8. Yes, the JDK can build itself
but it's can be very fragile to attempt to build it with a JDK 9 that
isn't quite in sync (esp. as command-line opti
