Re: RFR: 8016780: (xs) README-builds.html misses crucial requirement on bootstrap JDK

2013-06-18 Thread Stuart Marks
Hi folks, Looks like I generated a bit of discussion here. Let's try to tease apart some of the issues. 1) I think we need a better articulation of the rule about the boot JDK being N-1, thus my proposed change to the README. I don't mean to ever prohibit anybody from ever trying to build JD

Re: RFR: 8016780: (xs) README-builds.html misses crucial requirement on bootstrap JDK

2013-06-18 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2013-06-18 08:57, Daniel Fuchs wrote: On 6/18/13 8:28 AM, David Holmes wrote: On 18/06/2013 4:02 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: The only problem with using N is that you don't know whether you have broken building with N-1. Therefore the general recommendation for most people should be to alw

Re: RFR: 8016780: (xs) README-builds.html misses crucial requirement on bootstrap JDK

2013-06-18 Thread David Holmes
Hi Stuart, > I would like people to review the README change as well. Thanks. I don't think we should simply say "Do not use a build of JDK 8 as the boot JDK for building JDK 8." as that doesn't explain what the issue is. If I'm building the JDK for my own use I can use JDK8. So how about:

Re: RFR: 8016780: (xs) README-builds.html misses crucial requirement on bootstrap JDK

2013-06-18 Thread David Holmes
Hi Erik, On 18/06/2013 6:06 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: On 2013-06-18 08:57, Daniel Fuchs wrote: On 6/18/13 8:28 AM, David Holmes wrote: On 18/06/2013 4:02 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: The only problem with using N is that you don't know whether you have broken building with N-1. Therefore the ge

Re: RFR: 8016780: (xs) README-builds.html misses crucial requirement on bootstrap JDK

2013-06-18 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 06/18/2013 10:02 AM, David Holmes wrote: Hi Stuart, > I would like people to review the README change as well. Thanks. I don't think we should simply say "Do not use a build of JDK 8 as the boot JDK for building JDK 8." as that doesn't explain what the issue is. If I'm building the JDK fo

Re: RFR: 8016780: (xs) README-builds.html misses crucial requirement on bootstrap JDK

2013-06-18 Thread Alan Bateman
On 18/06/2013 08:42, Stuart Marks wrote: : 4) Could jaxp, jaxws, and corba be built with the current JDK, not the boot JDK? Sure, probably. I spoke with Jon G on this topic the other day and we didn't come up with any really good reasons why they need to be built with the boot JDK. Historical

Re: RFR: 8016605: New files dont apear in src.zip

2013-06-18 Thread Erik Joelsson
Thanks, I hit another problem after fixing this though. On windows, when building the sec-bin.zip, the root directory for the zip is $(JDK_OUTPUTDIR), which at the time contains something around 49k files. This proves too much for cygwin gnu make to handle and it crashes with a core dump. I

RFR: 8010385: build with LOG=trace broken on mac

2013-06-18 Thread Erik Joelsson
The log level 'trace' is broken on both mac and solaris. When trace is used, the shell variable is overridden to do the following: 1. Add -x to echo each line that gets executed. This causes all $(shell) expressions to be printed in addition to recipes. 2. Add some text explaining if it's a $(s

hg: jdk8/build: 2 new changesets

2013-06-18 Thread erik . joelsson
Changeset: 0d1e8518c722 Author:erikj Date: 2013-06-18 11:29 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/0d1e8518c722 8014404: Debug flag not added to jdk native compile when --enable-debug is set Reviewed-by: tbell ! common/autoconf/generated-configure.sh ! common/autoconf

HSX-25: Code Review (round 0) request for MacOS X exported symbols fix (8014326)

2013-06-18 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Greetings, I have picked up David Holmes' work on the following bug: 8014326 [OSX] All libjvm symbols are exported http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8014326 https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8014326 Here are the HSX-25 webrev URLs: OpenJDK: http://cr.openjdk.j

HSX-24: Code Review (round 0) request for MacOS X exported symbols fix (8014326)

2013-06-18 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Greetings, I have picked up David Holmes' work on the following bug: 8014326 [OSX] All libjvm symbols are exported http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8014326 https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8014326 Here are the HSX-24 backport webrev URLs: OpenJDK: http://cr

hg: jdk8/build: 2 new changesets

2013-06-18 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: 6337f652e71f Author:katleman Date: 2013-06-13 09:48 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/6337f652e71f Added tag jdk8-b94 for changeset 50d2bde060f2 ! .hgtags Changeset: 785d07fe3890 Author:katleman Date: 2013-06-18 15:32 -0700 URL: http://

hg: jdk8/build/corba: Added tag jdk8-b94 for changeset 22f5d7f261d9

2013-06-18 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: 2cf36f43df36 Author:katleman Date: 2013-06-13 09:48 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/corba/rev/2cf36f43df36 Added tag jdk8-b94 for changeset 22f5d7f261d9 ! .hgtags

hg: jdk8/build/jaxp: Added tag jdk8-b94 for changeset c84658e1740d

2013-06-18 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: b8c5f4b6f0ff Author:katleman Date: 2013-06-13 09:48 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxp/rev/b8c5f4b6f0ff Added tag jdk8-b94 for changeset c84658e1740d ! .hgtags

hg: jdk8/build/jdk: 4 new changesets

2013-06-18 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: 992b39afdcb9 Author:katleman Date: 2013-06-13 09:48 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/992b39afdcb9 Added tag jdk8-b94 for changeset 51479fa56b7c ! .hgtags Changeset: e7ece2dbdc70 Author:sla Date: 2013-06-10 11:33 +0200 URL: http://h

hg: jdk8/build/nashorn: Added tag jdk8-b94 for changeset d92b756bc739

2013-06-18 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: cbc9926f5b40 Author:katleman Date: 2013-06-13 09:49 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/nashorn/rev/cbc9926f5b40 Added tag jdk8-b94 for changeset d92b756bc739 ! .hgtags

hg: jdk8/build/hotspot: 5 new changesets

2013-06-18 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: 3a353050e85a Author:katleman Date: 2013-06-13 09:48 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/hotspot/rev/3a353050e85a Added tag jdk8-b94 for changeset 1beed1f6f9ed ! .hgtags Changeset: d0add7016434 Author:amurillo Date: 2013-06-07 09:33 -0700 URL:

hg: jdk8/build/jaxws: Added tag jdk8-b94 for changeset 254c53fd97ab

2013-06-18 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: 1468c94135f9 Author:katleman Date: 2013-06-13 09:48 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxws/rev/1468c94135f9 Added tag jdk8-b94 for changeset 254c53fd97ab ! .hgtags

hg: jdk8/build/langtools: Added tag jdk8-b94 for changeset 48c6e6ab7c81

2013-06-18 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: 4cb113623127 Author:katleman Date: 2013-06-13 09:49 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/langtools/rev/4cb113623127 Added tag jdk8-b94 for changeset 48c6e6ab7c81 ! .hgtags

Re: RFR: 8016780: (xs) README-builds.html misses crucial requirement on bootstrap JDK

2013-06-18 Thread Stuart Marks
On 6/18/13 2:16 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote: On 06/18/2013 10:02 AM, David Holmes wrote: I don't think we should simply say "Do not use a build of JDK 8 as the boot JDK for building JDK 8." as that doesn't explain what the issue is. If I'm building the JDK for my own use I can use JDK8. So how abo

Re: RFR: 8016780: (xs) README-builds.html misses crucial requirement on bootstrap JDK

2013-06-18 Thread Stuart Marks
On 6/18/13 2:25 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 18/06/2013 08:42, Stuart Marks wrote: 4) Could jaxp, jaxws, and corba be built with the current JDK, not the boot JDK? Sure, probably.[...] My understanding is that the new build is just following the old build[...] As least for the jaxws repositor

Re: HSX-24: Code Review (round 0) request for MacOS X exported symbols fix (8014326)

2013-06-18 Thread David Holmes
Thanks for picking this up Dan (and hs25) Given this was my suggested fix I guess you are actually the one that needs to review it :) For completeness I'll add that the linker complains about non-existent symbols on OSX hence the deletion of a number of entries. The linux and solaris mapfile

Re: HSX-24: Code Review (round 0) request for MacOS X exported symbols fix (8014326)

2013-06-18 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
On 6/18/13 8:11 PM, David Holmes wrote: Thanks for picking this up Dan (and hs25) You're welcome! Given this was my suggested fix I guess you are actually the one that needs to review it :) You are quite correct that I should have made this point clear. I'm planning to list you as "author"