On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 05:49:25 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Usual start-of-release updates. Symbol updates in initial version reflect JDK
> 20 build 21.
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10924
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 04:45:57 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Usual start-of-release updates. Symbol updates in initial version reflect
>> JDK 20 build 21.
>
> src/java.compiler/share/classes/javax/lang/model/util/AbstractAnnotationValueVisitor14.java
> line 47:
>
>> 45: * @since 14
>> 46: */
>>
On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 05:49:25 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Usual start-of-release updates. Symbol updates in initial version reflect JDK
> 20 build 21.
I looked at everything bar the sym files. All seems fine/usual.
One query below (probably one I ask each release).
Thanks.
src/java.compiler/share/
Usual start-of-release updates. Symbol updates in initial version reflect JDK
20 build 21.
-
Commit messages:
- Fix failed HotSpot regression tests.
- Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8296149
- Update symbol information to JDK 20 build 24.
- Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8296149
On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 05:49:25 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> Usual start-of-release updates. Symbol updates in initial version reflect JDK
> 20 build 21.
Flipping the draft-bit off for this PR ahead of the upcoming start of JDK 21.
Symbol information now up-to-date as of JDK 20 b25.
-
PR:
Add alignas to the permitted features set with some restrictions. (Thanks
@kimbarrett for the help)
-
Commit messages:
- HotSpot Style Guide changes
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11404/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=11404&range=00
Issue: https
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 21:33:23 GMT, Matias Saavedra Silva
wrote:
> The -XX:+AutoCreateSharedArchive flag was implemented in JDK 19, however,
> this flag doesn't work across JDK 19 and 20.
>
> Expected: JDK 20 should recreate the specified CDS archive
> Actual: JDK 20 cannot recognize the archive
On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 01:38:01 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Is the practice of naming the directory `snippets` well-established or
>> mandated? Otherwise I think a name like `snippet-files` (akin to
>> `doc-files`) would be much better, since it indicates that is not a java
>> package name. (These
> **This pull request is not intended for immediate integration to JDK
> mainline.**
>
> This is root pull request with Classfile API implementation, tests and
> benchmarks initial drop into JDK.
>
> Following pull requests consolidating JDK class files parsing, generating,
> and transforming
