> Clarify the intention of tier 1 tests. I'll reflow the paragraph and
> regenerate the HTML file once the wording is agreed upon.
Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Initial check-in of updated HTML file.
-
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:53:12 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Please review an update to the way that `javadoc` handles the default legal
>> notices when generating docs.
>>
>> Previously, the default notices were taken from the module's `legal`
>> directory (`$JAVA_HOME/legal/jdk.javadoc`),
On 10/29/23 11:21 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 21:03:50 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
So in terms of a sentence or two of guidance, I think "aim for 10 seconds or less
almost all of the time for a tier 1 test" is reasonable in this context.
Yes, I think making it an aspiration
On 10/30/23 10:05, Philip Race wrote:
It is possible to use Xcode 12 on macOS14.
Our internal build system manages to make this work.
Don't ask me for the details, because I don't know them very well.
Internally we use macOS 13.x and Xcode 14.3.1 to build JDK 22, and
macOS 12.x and Xcode
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 16:17:04 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> See [JDK-8288719](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8288719) and subsequent
> [discussion](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2022-May/034635.html)
> back in 2022.
>
> On Arm, we can generate either arm- or thumb-code
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 15:41:48 GMT, Robbin Ehn wrote:
> Hi all, please consider.
>
> Tested configure with binutils-src.
>
> Thanks
This is a good idea, but to get it to work I think we need to re-order things
in `configure.ac`. `BPERF_SETUP_BUILD_JOBS` is currently quite late.
> Clarify the intention of tier 1 tests. I'll reflow the paragraph and
> regenerate the HTML file once the wording is agreed upon.
Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Implement review feedback.
-
Changes:
-
On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 18:19:12 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> > So in terms of a sentence or two of guidance, I think "aim for 10 seconds
> > or less almost all of the time for a tier 1 test" is reasonable in this
> > context.
>
> Yes, I think making it an aspiration would be better.
>
> In
It is possible to use Xcode 12 on macOS14.
Our internal build system manages to make this work.
Don't ask me for the details, because I don't know them very well.
I think you may have to create a (free) Apple developer a/c to be able
to get the
older Xcodes. That's step 1.
But you are going to
See [JDK-8288719](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8288719) and subsequent
[discussion](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2022-May/034635.html)
back in 2022.
On Arm, we can generate either arm- or thumb-code (`-marm` or `-mthumb`).
At the moment, if we don't specify an ABI
Hi all, please consider.
Tested configure with binutils-src.
Thanks
-
Commit messages:
- Use -j
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16421/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk=16421=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319121
Stats: 2 lines in 1
> Prepare HotSpot for the permissive- Visual C++ flag, this change contains all
> of the fixes required for HotSpot to compile under the stricter mode
> activated when the permissive- flag is passed
>
> - Reworks code in topLevelUnhandledExceptionFilter for os_windows.cpp to
> avoid goto
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 15:08:03 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> Prepare HotSpot for the permissive- Visual C++ flag, this change contains
>> all of the fixes required for HotSpot to compile under the stricter mode
>> activated when the permissive- flag is passed
>>
>> - Reworks code in
Dear Philip
Thanks for your response and directions.
I guess it is not possible to use Xcode 12.x on MacOS14, because it asks
for the latest version of Xcode.
I used the OpenJDk20 binary and OpenJDK21 binary to create the build from
OpenJDK21+35 source code, but I'm still facing the same
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 01:41:16 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
> Implementation of [JEP draft: Compile the JDK as
> C++17](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310260)
Keeping alive
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14988#issuecomment-1785145814
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:43:58 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> Increase javacserver connection timeout values and max retry attempts for
> better make stability on some slower machines.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: b9983c72
Author:Matthias Baesken
URL:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 09:29:05 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> Increase javacserver connection timeout values and max retry attempts for
>> better make stability on some slower machines.
>
> Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 09:29:05 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> Increase javacserver connection timeout values and max retry attempts for
>> better make stability on some slower machines.
>
> Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last
> Increase javacserver connection timeout values and max retry attempts for
> better make stability on some slower machines.
Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Adjust WAIT_BETWEEN_CONNECT_ATTEMPTS
-
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:43:58 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> Increase javacserver connection timeout values and max retry attempts for
> better make stability on some slower machines.
I adjusted the WAIT_BETWEEN_CONNECT_ATTEMPTS; Let's how this works.
-
PR Comment:
20 matches
Mail list logo
