On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 07:36:04 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> We should set the -permissive- flag for the Microsoft Visual C compiler, as
>> was requested by the now backed out
>> [JDK-8241499](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8241499). Doing so makes
>> the Visual C compiler much less acceptin
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 16:16:50 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> With the JDK 22 GA out it's time to bump the minimum boot JDK version for
> mainline/JDK 23.
>
> Testing: tier1-5, GHA
Marked as reviewed by erikj (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18563#pullrequest
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 16:16:50 GMT, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
> With the JDK 22 GA out it's time to bump the minimum boot JDK version for
> mainline/JDK 23.
>
> Testing: tier1-5, GHA
Thanks!
-
Marked as reviewed by iris (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18563#pul
With the JDK 22 GA out it's time to bump the minimum boot JDK version for
mainline/JDK 23.
Testing: tier1-5, GHA
-
Commit messages:
- 8320799: Bump minimum boot jdk to JDK 22
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18563/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=1
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 07:36:04 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> We should set the -permissive- flag for the Microsoft Visual C compiler, as
>> was requested by the now backed out
>> [JDK-8241499](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8241499). Doing so makes
>> the Visual C compiler much less acceptin
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 07:36:04 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> We should set the -permissive- flag for the Microsoft Visual C compiler, as
>> was requested by the now backed out
>> [JDK-8241499](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8241499). Doing so makes
>> the Visual C compiler much less acceptin
On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 19:50:16 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> Fixed the formatting (at least in the marked cases), but am unsure what you
>> mean by set directly?
>
>> Fixed the formatting (at least in the marked cases), but am unsure what you
>> mean by set directly?
>
> See my comment
> "like in my
