> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM
> Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only
> supporting the version specified in this change.
>
> I need someone from the aix-ppc porters to test and review the change.
Kim Barrett has
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM
> Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only
> supporting the version specified in this change.
>
> I need someone from the aix-ppc
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM
> Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only
> supporting the version specified in this change.
>
> I need someone from the aix-ppc
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 09:10:50 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote:
>>> > What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang
>>> > but still with an xlc frontend, so all xlc flags etc need to stay?
>>>
>>> The `xlc` toolchain is for the compiler versions up to 16 (xlclang++); the
>>>
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 08:41:00 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> > > What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang
> > > but still with an xlc frontend, so all xlc flags etc need to stay?
> >
> >
> > The `xlc` toolchain is for the compiler versions up to 16 (xlclang++); the
> >
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM
> Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only
> supporting the version specified in this change.
>
> I need someone from the aix-ppc
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:10:32 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote:
> > What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang but
> > still with an xlc frontend, so all xlc flags etc need to stay?
>
> The `xlc` toolchain is for the compiler versions up to 16 (xlclang++); the
> `clang`
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM
> Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only
> supporting the version specified in this change.
>
> I need someone from the aix-ppc
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM
> Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only
> supporting the version specified in this change.
>
> I need someone from the aix-ppc
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:49:26 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
> > > I see. I believe I wrote that piece of code, but I'd clearly forgotten
> > > that. Thanks! :)
> >
> >
> > No, this was added by me, because this was the root point to still resolve
> > to globalDefinitions_xlc.hpp even with
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:36:25 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote:
> > I see. I believe I wrote that piece of code, but I'd clearly forgotten
> > that. Thanks! :)
>
> No, this was added by me, because this was the root point to still resolve to
> globalDefinitions_xlc.hpp even with toolchain clang
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:29:50 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> I see. I believe I wrote that piece of code, but I'd clearly forgotten that.
> Thanks! :)
No, this was added by me, because this was the root point to still resolve to
globalDefinitions_xlc.hpp even with toolchain clang
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM
> Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only
> supporting the version specified in this change.
>
> I need someone from the aix-ppc
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:10:32 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote:
>> What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang but
>> still with an xlc frontend, so all xlc flags etc need to stay?
>
>> What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang but
>> still with an
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:10:32 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote:
>> What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang but
>> still with an xlc frontend, so all xlc flags etc need to stay?
>
>> What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang but
>> still with an
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:40:53 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang but
> still with an xlc frontend, so all xlc flags etc need to stay?
The `xlc` toolchain is for the compiler versions up to 16 (xlclang++); the
`clang`
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM
> Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only
> supporting the version specified in this change.
>
> I need someone from the aix-ppc
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM
> Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only
> supporting the version specified in this change.
>
> I need someone from the aix-ppc
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM
> Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only
> supporting the version specified in this change.
>
> I need someone from the aix-ppc
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM
> Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only
> supporting the version specified in this change.
>
> I need someone from the aix-ppc
Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM
Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only
supporting the version specified in this change.
I need someone from the aix-ppc porters to test and review the change.
-
Commit
21 matches
Mail list logo