Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1 [v2]

2024-03-06 Thread Kim Barrett
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM > Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only > supporting the version specified in this change. > > I need someone from the aix-ppc porters to test and review the change. Kim Barrett has

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-03-06 Thread Kim Barrett
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: > Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM > Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only > supporting the version specified in this change. > > I need someone from the aix-ppc

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-03-05 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: > Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM > Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only > supporting the version specified in this change. > > I need someone from the aix-ppc

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-03-05 Thread Kim Barrett
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 09:10:50 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote: >>> > What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang >>> > but still with an xlc frontend, so all xlc flags etc need to stay? >>> >>> The `xlc` toolchain is for the compiler versions up to 16 (xlclang++); the >>>

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-03-05 Thread Joachim Kern
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 08:41:00 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: > > > What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang > > > but still with an xlc frontend, so all xlc flags etc need to stay? > > > > > > The `xlc` toolchain is for the compiler versions up to 16 (xlclang++); the > >

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-03-05 Thread Martin Doerr
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: > Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM > Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only > supporting the version specified in this change. > > I need someone from the aix-ppc

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-03-05 Thread Kim Barrett
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:10:32 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote: > > What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang but > > still with an xlc frontend, so all xlc flags etc need to stay? > > The `xlc` toolchain is for the compiler versions up to 16 (xlclang++); the > `clang`

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-02-27 Thread Kim Barrett
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: > Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM > Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only > supporting the version specified in this change. > > I need someone from the aix-ppc

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-02-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: > Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM > Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only > supporting the version specified in this change. > > I need someone from the aix-ppc

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-02-15 Thread Joachim Kern
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:49:26 GMT, Julian Waters wrote: > > > I see. I believe I wrote that piece of code, but I'd clearly forgotten > > > that.  Thanks! :) > > > > > > No, this was added by me, because this was the root point to still resolve > > to globalDefinitions_xlc.hpp even with

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-02-15 Thread Julian Waters
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:36:25 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote: > > I see. I believe I wrote that piece of code, but I'd clearly forgotten > > that.  Thanks! :) > > No, this was added by me, because this was the root point to still resolve to > globalDefinitions_xlc.hpp even with toolchain clang

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-02-15 Thread Joachim Kern
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:29:50 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > I see. I believe I wrote that piece of code, but I'd clearly forgotten that. >  Thanks! :) No, this was added by me, because this was the root point to still resolve to globalDefinitions_xlc.hpp even with toolchain clang

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-02-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: > Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM > Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only > supporting the version specified in this change. > > I need someone from the aix-ppc

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-02-15 Thread Julian Waters
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:10:32 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote: >> What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang but >> still with an xlc frontend, so all xlc flags etc need to stay? > >> What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang but >> still with an

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-02-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:10:32 GMT, Joachim Kern wrote: >> What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang but >> still with an xlc frontend, so all xlc flags etc need to stay? > >> What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang but >> still with an

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-02-15 Thread Joachim Kern
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:40:53 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > What does this mean? That you are not using xlc at all? Or is it clang but > still with an xlc frontend, so all xlc flags etc need to stay? The `xlc` toolchain is for the compiler versions up to 16 (xlclang++); the `clang`

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-02-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: > Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM > Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only > supporting the version specified in this change. > > I need someone from the aix-ppc

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-02-15 Thread Julian Waters
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: > Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM > Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only > supporting the version specified in this change. > > I need someone from the aix-ppc

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-02-15 Thread Joachim Kern
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: > Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM > Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only > supporting the version specified in this change. > > I need someone from the aix-ppc

Re: RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-02-15 Thread Martin Doerr
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 22:43:37 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote: > Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM > Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only > supporting the version specified in this change. > > I need someone from the aix-ppc

RFR: 8325880: Require minimum Open XL C/C++ version 17.1.1

2024-02-14 Thread Kim Barrett
Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of IBM Open XL C/C++. SAP dropped support for older versions in JDK 22, only supporting the version specified in this change. I need someone from the aix-ppc porters to test and review the change. - Commit