On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 11:01:03 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Once [JDK-8017234](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8017234) has been
>> integrated, it is possible to do some cleanup. The goal of
>> [JDK-8017234](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8017234) was to not change
>> any
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:35:56 GMT, Ludovic Henry wrote:
>> It does not sound like anyone object to the removal of `JNIEXPORT` for
>> `das1`, then.
>>
>> Or should I just remove the entire function, if it serves no purpose that
>> any current maintainers know or care about?
>
> You can probably
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 20:07:35 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> I use `das` every day. In contrast, I don't know what `das1` is for.
>
> It does not sound like anyone object to the removal of `JNIEXPORT` for
> `das1`, then.
>
> Or should I just remove the entire function, if it serves no
> Once [JDK-8017234](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8017234) has been
> integrated, it is possible to do some cleanup. The goal of
> [JDK-8017234](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8017234) was to not change
> any behavior, even if that behavior seemed odd.
>
> Now let's try to fix
