On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 13:37:04 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Justin King has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Revert changes to JDK
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Justin King
>
> I apologize, the fault lies entirely with me.
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 15:39:17 GMT, Justin King wrote:
> > I read through your explanation, and through the [design
> > docs](https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerLeakSanitizerDesignDocument),
> > but my question remains unanswered. See below.
> > > > Metaspace objects hold
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 06:58:52 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> I read through your explanation, and through the [design
> docs](https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerLeakSanitizerDesignDocument),
> but my question remains unanswered. See below.
>
> > > Metaspace objects hold
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 06:45:28 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> The informal rule is that ongoing discussions should be closed and that
> nobody strongly objects to a change. Two reviewers are easy to come by. The
> point of this rule is that you have a reasonable chance to block changes you
>
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:40:34 GMT, Justin King wrote:
>> Adds initial LSan (LeakSanitizer) support to Hotspot. This setup has been
>> used to identify multiple leaks so far. It can run most of the test suite
>> except those that also fail with ASan, which is being looked at separately.
>> It is
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:40:34 GMT, Justin King wrote:
>> Adds initial LSan (LeakSanitizer) support to Hotspot. This setup has been
>> used to identify multiple leaks so far. It can run most of the test suite
>> except those that also fail with ASan, which is being looked at separately.
>> It is
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 03:11:32 GMT, Justin King wrote:
> > The bot can only check the required number of Reviewers (strictly 1 per
> > OpenJDK rules but changeable as here via `/reviewers` command) but it
> > doesn't know about the informal rules such as having reviewers from each
> > affected
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 02:53:51 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> The bot can only check the required number of Reviewers (strictly 1 per
> OpenJDK rules but changeable as here via `/reviewers` command) but it doesn't
> know about the informal rules such as having reviewers from each affected
> area
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:40:34 GMT, Justin King wrote:
>> Adds initial LSan (LeakSanitizer) support to Hotspot. This setup has been
>> used to identify multiple leaks so far. It can run most of the test suite
>> except those that also fail with ASan, which is being looked at separately.
>> It is
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:40:34 GMT, Justin King wrote:
>> Adds initial LSan (LeakSanitizer) support to Hotspot. This setup has been
>> used to identify multiple leaks so far. It can run most of the test suite
>> except those that also fail with ASan, which is being looked at separately.
>> It is
> Adds initial LSan (LeakSanitizer) support to Hotspot. This setup has been
> used to identify multiple leaks so far. It can run most of the test suite
> except those that also fail with ASan, which is being looked at separately.
> It is especially useful when combined with ASan, as LSan can
11 matches
Mail list logo
