Re: RFR: JDK-8302801: Remove fdlibm C sources [v2]

2023-03-02 Thread Joe Darcy
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 19:19:20 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Respond to review feedback and add description of transliteration process. > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/St

Re: RFR: JDK-8302801: Remove fdlibm C sources [v2]

2023-03-02 Thread Alan Bateman
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:31:54 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: >> While the review of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12800 finishes up, I >> thought I'd get out for the review the next phase of the FDLIBM port: >> removing the FDLIBM C sources from the repo. >> >> A repo with the changes for JDK-83020

Re: RFR: JDK-8302801: Remove fdlibm C sources [v2]

2023-03-02 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:31:54 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote: >> While the review of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12800 finishes up, I >> thought I'd get out for the review the next phase of the FDLIBM port: >> removing the FDLIBM C sources from the repo. >> >> A repo with the changes for JDK-83020

Re: RFR: JDK-8302801: Remove fdlibm C sources [v2]

2023-03-02 Thread Joe Darcy
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:05:55 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote: >> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Respond to review feedback and add description of transliteration process. > > make/autoconf/buildjdk-spec.gmk.in line 85:

Re: RFR: JDK-8302801: Remove fdlibm C sources [v2]

2023-03-02 Thread Joe Darcy
> While the review of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12800 finishes up, I > thought I'd get out for the review the next phase of the FDLIBM port: > removing the FDLIBM C sources from the repo. > > A repo with the changes for JDK-8302027 and this PR successful build on the > default set of