Re: [PATCH 00/39] Windows port, base and archival/

2010-04-24 Thread Rob Landley
On Tuesday 20 April 2010 16:48:16 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > this is a ton of duplicate crap and exactly why i suggested we look at > > > integrating something like gnulib/ for portability. busybox shouldnt > > > be wasting any time at all on this. > > > > How about a subproject for the above stu

Re: [PATCH 00/39] Windows port, base and archival/

2010-04-24 Thread Rob Landley
On Tuesday 20 April 2010 12:47:30 Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > > this is a ton of duplicate crap and exactly why i suggested we look at > > integrating something like gnulib/ for portability. busybox shouldnt be > > wasting any time at all on this. > > How about a subproject for the above stuff?

Re: [PATCH 06/39] win32: add missing system headers

2010-04-24 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 19 April 2010 00:52:57 Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Rob Landley wrote: > >> > Surely this is a defect in your build environment? These are standard > >> > system headers. Your C library is defective. > >> > >> Welcome to Windows. > > > > How is a clea

Re: [PATCH 06/39] win32: add missing system headers

2010-04-24 Thread Rob Landley
On Sunday 18 April 2010 12:31:22 Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > Twas brillig at 01:27:35 18.04.2010 UTC-05 when r...@landley.net did gyre and gimble: > >> create mode 100644 win32/grp.h > >> create mode 100644 win32/netdb.h > >> create mode 100644 win32/pwd.h > >> create mode 100644 win32/sys/io

Re: [PATCH 00/39] Windows port, base and archival/

2010-04-24 Thread Rob Landley
And this one too... On Monday 19 April 2010 00:43:18 Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > >> If you read the patch, you would see that it only refuses to build you > >> you do use MinGW compiler and not have TARGET_WIN32 set. > > > > I mean the approach of annotating magic knowledge of build environments

Re: [PATCH 06/39] win32: add missing system headers

2010-04-24 Thread Rob Landley
I still have this open from a few days ago, I don't _think_ I already sent it. (Spent this week sick, still not quite back up to speed...) On Monday 19 April 2010 00:52:57 Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Rob Landley wrote: > >> > Surely this is a defect in your b

Re: networking with busybox

2010-04-24 Thread Katharina Haselhorst
Hello, No, I can't ping any machine on the same subnet. The kernel should be ok, it is the same kernel I usually use for starting xen domains. Since it's a xen kernel, I assume, that the network modules and the drivers for the xen interface cards are already built into the kernel. Atm, I have no

Re: networking with busybox

2010-04-24 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
Hi, bran...@mathematik.uni-marburg.de wrote, > Hello, > > > Hi, > > bran...@mathematik.uni-marburg.de wrote, > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I would like to use busybox in a custom initramfs environment, where > >> some > >> networking tasks need to be done. This includes: > >> - requesting an ip addre

Re: networking with busybox

2010-04-24 Thread brandlk
>> I started udevd and issued a udevadm trigger and a udevadm settle. After >> that, I get a eth0 device, as expected. But as I mentioned above, I >> can't work with that interface. Which kernel module do I need? Atm I >> don't have any modules included in the initramfs, but that's easy to > chang

Re: networking with busybox

2010-04-24 Thread brandlk
Hello, > Hi, > bran...@mathematik.uni-marburg.de wrote, > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to use busybox in a custom initramfs environment, where >> some >> networking tasks need to be done. This includes: >> - requesting an ip address from a dhcp server >> - resolving some hostnames (not necessarily

Re: networking with busybox

2010-04-24 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
Hi, bran...@mathematik.uni-marburg.de wrote, > Hello, > > I would like to use busybox in a custom initramfs environment, where some > networking tasks need to be done. This includes: > - requesting an ip address from a dhcp server > - resolving some hostnames (not necessarily through a nameserver

Re: networking with busybox

2010-04-24 Thread Gilles Espinasse
- Original Message - From: "Katharina Haselhorst" To: "Gilles Espinasse" Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:36 PM Subject: Re: networking with busybox > >> As far, I have built a complete busybox binary (statically linked) and got > >> an ash running within the initramfs. I can assign a s

Re: networking with busybox

2010-04-24 Thread Katharina Haselhorst
Hello, On 04/24/2010 05:32 PM, Gilles Espinasse wrote: - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 4:36 PM Subject: networking with busybox Hello, I would like to use busybox in a custom initramfs environment, where some networking tasks need to be done. This inclu

Re: networking with busybox

2010-04-24 Thread Gilles Espinasse
- Original Message - From: To: Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 4:36 PM Subject: networking with busybox > Hello, > > I would like to use busybox in a custom initramfs environment, where some > networking tasks need to be done. This includes: > - requesting an ip address from a dhcp ser

networking with busybox

2010-04-24 Thread brandlk
Hello, I would like to use busybox in a custom initramfs environment, where some networking tasks need to be done. This includes: - requesting an ip address from a dhcp server - resolving some hostnames (not necessarily through a nameserver - could be statically via a hosts file) - run some servic