Re: coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread

2012-10-18 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote: >> It's perfectly fine for developers to enforce the license of *their* >> code, that is enforced by copyright law, I *never* said otherwise. But >> developers shouldn't weigh on the code of other developers in the

Re: coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread

2012-10-18 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 01:19:02PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Rich Felker wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 03:26:06PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Bradley M. K

[PATCH] was Re:: memory usage increases with redirection on loop

2012-10-18 Thread Jon Tollefson
On 10/10/2012 04:06 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: ... ==20170== 4,883,404 bytes in 9,613 blocks are still reachable in loss record 15 of 15 ==20170==at 0x48CF308: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so) ==20170==by 0x804EE8B: xmalloc (xfuncs_printf.c:47) ==20170==

Re: coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread

2012-10-18 Thread Bradley M. Kuhn
Felipe Contreras wrote: > It's perfectly fine for developers to enforce the license of *their* > code, that is enforced by copyright law, I *never* said otherwise. But > developers shouldn't weigh on the code of other developers in the > project, or even other projects. If you agree that copyrigh

Re: coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread

2012-10-18 Thread Rich Felker
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 01:19:02PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 03:26:06PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > >> > Felipe Contreras wrote at 00:52 (EDT):

Re: coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread

2012-10-18 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote at 06:26 (PDT) on Wednesday: >> It doesn't matter how the GPL was designed, the GPL doesn't have >> precedence over the law, and the law doesn't allow a software license >> to change the nature of copyright law. > > T

Re: coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread

2012-10-18 Thread Bradley M. Kuhn
Felipe Contreras wrote at 06:26 (PDT) on Wednesday: > It doesn't matter how the GPL was designed, the GPL doesn't have > precedence over the law, and the law doesn't allow a software license > to change the nature of copyright law. The GPL *doesn't* change the nature of copyright law. It uses cop

Re: coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread

2012-10-18 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:02 PM, farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: > This is the first one I found, there may be more: > > http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/GPL-wins-in-French-court-case- > 812269.html Yea, copyright law protecting the developers, as it was intended. -- Felipe Contreras

Re: coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread

2012-10-18 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 03:26:06PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: >> > Felipe Contreras wrote at 00:52 (EDT): >> >> I'm talking about rights. As a user, I don't have any rights, only >