Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru
---
networking/libiproute/iproute.c | 18 +-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/networking/libiproute/iproute.c b/networking/libiproute/iproute.c
index ec4d8ba..273f6fe 100644
---
Hello. I submitted the attached patch to the list 2 times, but
it never made into the list for some reason. Last time was
today, here's a line from my maillog:
Jul 28 06:05:45 isrv postfix/smtp[24869]: 4586B45736: to=busybox@busybox.net,
\
relay=smtp1.osuosl.org[140.211.166.138]:25,
28.07.2014 10:23, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Hello. I submitted the attached patch to the list 2 times, but
it never made into the list for some reason. Last time was
today, here's a line from my maillog:
Jul 28 06:05:45 isrv postfix/smtp[24869]: 4586B45736:
to=busybox@busybox.net, \
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:23:40AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Hello. I submitted the attached patch to the list 2 times, but
it never made into the list for some reason. Last time was
today, here's a line from my maillog:
Jul 28 06:05:45 isrv postfix/smtp[24869]:
28.07.2014 10:46, Baruch Siach wrote:
[]
I received your original post today. It's also on the gmane.org archive at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.busybox/39641.
Oh. I think I know what's going on. The mailing list does not
send email to the author if he's already listed in a Cc list.
2014-07-03 14:27 GMT+02:00 Bartosz Gołaszewski bartekg...@gmail.com:
Hi Denys,
have you read my message from June 10th in this thread? Could you
review the patches I attached back then? Busybox still uses ARG_MAX as
default, which is smaller than sysconf(_SC_ARG_MAX) on every system I
Hi,
2014-07-26 15:05 GMT-03:00 walter harms wha...@bfs.de:
actually strlen() returns size_t. When you really need this to be correct
you should use size_t.
I know. I simply didn't see anywhere nearby using size_t, then I
assumed unsigned was used instead. But, I'd rather use size_t!
Did you
Hi,
2014-07-26 15:02 GMT-03:00 walter harms wha...@bfs.de:
what is the advantage ?
I think correctness is a good advantage. I mean, why use a signed
integer, if this variable works as (and with) unsigned integers only?
re,
wh
Am 26.07.2014 19:37, schrieb Guilherme Maciel Ferreira:
The
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:50:28 +0200
Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Timo Teräs timo.te...@iki.fi wrote:
display_header() code to parse meminfo as is was buggy:
- uninitialized variables were used if meminfo was not as expected
- meminfo
Timo Teras wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:50:28 +0200
Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
Applied, thanks!
Thanks, though I noticed now a weirdness that did not happen before.
+static void parse_meminfo(unsigned long meminfo[MI_MAX])
+{
...
+ memset(meminfo, 0,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:27:37 +0200
Ralf Friedl ralf.fri...@online.de wrote:
Timo Teras wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:50:28 +0200
Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
Applied, thanks!
Thanks, though I noticed now a weirdness that did not happen before.
+static void
2014-07-28 17:25 GMT+02:00 Timo Teras timo.te...@iki.fi:
So something like:
diff --git a/procps/top.c b/procps/top.c
index 62f9421..119c32b 100644
--- a/procps/top.c
+++ b/procps/top.c
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static void parse_meminfo(unsigned long meminfo[MI_MAX])
FILE *f;
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 17:52:41 +0200
Bartosz Gołaszewski bartekg...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-28 17:25 GMT+02:00 Timo Teras timo.te...@iki.fi:
So something like:
diff --git a/procps/top.c b/procps/top.c
index 62f9421..119c32b 100644
--- a/procps/top.c
+++ b/procps/top.c
@@ -536,7
2014-07-28 18:48 GMT+02:00 Timo Teras timo.te...@iki.fi:
I was taking sizeof of individual element: meminfo[0]. Alternative
would be sizeof *meminfo. I prefer not to expand to the actual type.
It's easier to change if needed, and the correctness more obvious as
you don't need to look what was
14 matches
Mail list logo
