On 30 Jan 2018 04:10, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Yunlian Jiang wrote:
> > I will use a similar issue in lineedit.c to explain the problem. (it is
> > easier to reproduce).
> > The problem is that
> > clang thinks lineedit_ptr_to_statics is a
On 30 Jan 2018 04:00, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> I still wonder how on Earth Android filesystem ended up not having /bin/sh.
> >> No one at Google realized that people are using shell scripts
> >> all over the Unix universe? Or they
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Yunlian Jiang wrote:
> I will use a similar issue in lineedit.c to explain the problem. (it is
> easier to reproduce).
> The problem is that
> clang thinks lineedit_ptr_to_statics is a constant pointer, so the pointer
> should be unchanged. As
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> I still wonder how on Earth Android filesystem ended up not having /bin/sh.
>> No one at Google realized that people are using shell scripts
>> all over the Unix universe? Or they seriously did not want people
>> to run
On 29 Jan 2018 18:52, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> >> >> I wish bash wouldn't introduce gratuitous standard violations.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > bash is its own shell. why can't it introduce its own extensions as
> >> >> > it
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:55 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >> >> I wish bash wouldn't introduce gratuitous standard violations.
>> >> >
>> >> > bash is its own shell. why can't it introduce its own extensions as it
>> >> > sees
>> >> > fit ?
>> >>
>> >> Because a divergence is
Am 28.01.2018 19:23, schrieb Denys Vlasenko:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 11:10 AM, walter harms wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 1:28 AM, Povilas Kanapickas
>>> wrote:
>> The following patches add SCHED_BATCH and SCHED_IDLE support to chrt.
>> The
On 29 Jan 2018 08:42, Paul Otto wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 28 Jan 2018 19:17, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > > Making bash "source" behavior non-standard had nothing useful in it.
> >
> > "source" is already non-standard and not specified in POSIX. so
On 29 Jan 2018 14:41, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 28 Jan 2018 19:17, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > On 26 Jan 2018 15:15, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:34
Thanks for the heads up, William! Great to hear!
Thanks,
Paul
On Jan 29, 2018 8:49 AM, "William Pitcock" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Paul Otto wrote:
> > Thanks for taking care of this, Denys. It didn't wind up the way I'd
>
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 4:42 PM, Paul Otto wrote:
>
>
>
>> > Making bash "source" behavior non-standard had nothing useful in it.
>>
>> "source" is already non-standard and not specified in POSIX. so simply by
>> using it, your script is not POSIX compliant.
>
>
> That
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Paul Otto wrote:
> Thanks for taking care of this, Denys. It didn't wind up the way I'd hoped,
> but at least it is predictable both ways now. I will see if there is a way
> to get Alpine Linux to build with that config option set, to
I really want to argue that there is a quite simple workaround to get the
bash 'source' behavior you need: Just append ":." to the PATH environment
variable before you run the "." command.
Or this:
source () {
PATH="$PATH:." . "$@"
}
Was there any difficulty of doing it?
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 28 Jan 2018 19:17, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On 26 Jan 2018 15:15, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Paul Otto wrote:
> > >> >
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 28 Jan 2018 19:17, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > On 26 Jan 2018 15:15, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Paul Otto wrote:
>> >> > This
15 matches
Mail list logo