On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:44:56PM -0400, Peter Davis wrote:
> Peter Davis wrote:
>
> >Ralf Utermann wrote:
> >
> >>On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:25:32AM -0400, Peter Davis wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>[...]
> >>
> >>
> >>>trying to set it up as an IMAP4/SquirrelMail server. I built openssl and
> >>>imap,
Ralf Utermann wrote:
If everything is installed as default and correct on the imap-server,
then check your cert file with something like:
openssl x509 -noout -fingerprint -inform PEM < /usr/local/certs/imapd.pem
I did find a /usr/local/ssl/certs directory, but no imapd.pem file.
There's no su
c-client (imap-2004a) seems to completely ignore the information
contained in body parts whose content-type is message/delivery-status.
Am I missing something? If not, are there any plans to add support for
getting the information for this content-type?
Thanks,
ryan
--
---
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Ryan Dingman wrote:
c-client (imap-2004a) seems to completely ignore the information contained in
body parts whose content-type is message/delivery-status. Am I missing
something? If not, are there any plans to add support for getting the
information for this content-type?
All-
I have a vague recollection of reading that a bug in mailutil was recently
fixed where mailutil would miss the last message in a folder when doing
a `move' or `appenddelete', but I can't find any reference to that in
2004a and the 2004b dev doesn't include any kind of ChangeLog, so I don't
kno
If by "the other 20 megabytes" you are referring to the difference between
53775404 and 31356329, that difference is probably in expunged messages
which never got garbage collected because the expunge was always from a
shared-access session.
The way to test that is to expunge INBOX.head without
In regard to: Re: mailutil appenddelete silently loses mail?, Mark Crispin...:
If by "the other 20 megabytes" you are referring to the difference between
53775404 and 31356329,
Yes.
that difference is probably in expunged messages which
never got garbage collected because the expunge was always f
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Tim Mooney wrote:
What's the best source for information on the MBX internal header?
Some information is in the IMAP FAQs:
http://www.washington.edu/imap/IMAP-FAQs/index.html#7.15
I
think it's time I learn the signficance of the various bytes in the
internal header afte
