Re: Converting from unix to mbx format

2004-04-20 Thread David Lee
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: > On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, David Lee wrote: > > A further question: if the INBOX is in the home directory, and an incoming > > message would take it over quota, what is _supposed_ to happen? > > If delivery fails due to over quota, it is s

Re: Converting from unix to mbx format

2004-04-19 Thread David Lee
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: > On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, David Lee wrote: > > Is there any reason why "/var/mail/$user" (usually in trad. UNIX format) > > cannot itself be in "mbx" format? (Trying it as such seems not to work, > > and this seems

Re: PAM credential cleanup

2004-04-19 Thread David Lee
essed, please Many thanks. Sorry for not reporting it earlier: I considered it, but thought that I would have been a lone voice, pleading a minority interest corner. It is at least reassuring to know that there are more of us. Thanks again, M

Re: Converting from unix to mbx format

2004-04-15 Thread David Lee
quot; area, but in (optional) "mbx" format. Any philosophical reasons why this (so it seems) is not possible? Thanks in advance. -- : David LeeI.T. Service : : Systems Programmer Computer Centre : :

Re: RH9; imap-2002e; PAM authentication

2003-10-01 Thread David Lee
ils. That was it! Thanks. Appreciated. (Although much Solaris experience, including PAM, I'm still finding my feet with Linux.) -- : David LeeI.T. Service : : Systems Programmer

RH9; imap-2002e; PAM authentication

2003-10-01 Thread David Lee
Linux pluto2 2.4.20-19.9smp #1 SMP Tue Jul 15 17:04:18 EDT 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux cc --version: cc (GCC) 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5) ] Any thoughts, tips, hints etc. and what I might have missed? (Or known bugs/issues, etc.?) -- : David Lee