RE: Logging

> -Original Message- > From: Nicholas Lesiecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 January 2002 16:47 > To: Cactus Developers List > Subject: Logging > > Of course. :) Hey, would it make sense to introduce a logger on each class > in the cactus package, A logger class is only needed

Logging

Of course. :) Hey, would it make sense to introduce a logger on each class in the cactus package, or better yet a log() method that you could simply call from any class? I also wanted to refactor the logging aspect, but I got stuck trying to test my changes. Re: the subject line. I meant: >>RE:

RE: Adding Authentication To Cactus

Are you referring to the subscribe/unsubscribe message ? If so, it is added automatically by the mailing-list manager when it sends a message to the list. -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Nicholas Lesiecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 04 January 2002 16:21 > To: Cactus Develop

RE: Adding Authentication To Cactus

Ok, that would be nice :-), but be careful as we still want to keep the same rules for logging. The only difference is that entry and exit of methods must not be explicitly logged as it is done automatically by AspectJ. But it is still valid to write log statements of course. Thanks -Vincent >

RE: Adding Authentication To Cactus

I have no idea why my last subject line reads like that. -Original Message- From: Nicholas Lesiecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:07 AM To: Cactus Developers List Subject: RE: Adding Authentication To Cactus I noticed we still have code convention about log

RE: Adding Authentication To Cactus

I noticed we still have code convention about logging on the contributors page. I could edit this sometime this weekend if you like. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: