Hi Markus,
Thanks very much for this. Do you think you could create a JIRA issue and
attach your patch to it? (http://issues.apache.org/jira).
Also, I think it would be good to base your implementation on the JBoss3x
implementation that already exists. I'm sure you can reuse at least 80% of
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CACTUS-132?page=history ]
Felipe Leme updated CACTUS-132:
---
Attachment: CACTUS-132-felipeal.patch2
Polished some documentation and updated with CVS (because of CACTUS-132 fix).
> Allow cactus plugin to include some re
felipeal2004/10/26 18:11:30
Modified:integration/maven/xdocs changes.xml
Log:
added CACTUS-128
Revision ChangesPath
1.48 +4 -0 jakarta-cactus/integration/maven/xdocs/changes.xml
Index: changes.xml
==
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 06:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think it could be easy to do by adding includes and exclude in the
> ant:copy task.
It might be, I just haven't tried yet.
> Why not using this king of thing ?
> cactus.resources.dirs=logResources,otherResources
> cactus.resources.logReso
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 12:34, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Ok. I have not been very active in Cactus land recently but I think it would
> be a good idea for us to pay attention again to Gump and fix our build.
I'm paying attention to the NAGs, but:
1.I was never sure if it was a Cactus or Gump(y) erro
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
>> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > But then the Cactus Gump(y) build started to fail very often and
>> > every time the reason
Hi Stefan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 26 octobre 2004 15:46
> To: Cactus Developers List
> Subject: Gump (was Re: Issue compiling Cactus under JDK 1.5)
>
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But th
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But then the Cactus Gump(y) build started to fail very often and
> every time the reason was either in Gump(y) or in some dependent
> project. I was not able to find enough time and energy to continue
> fixing the outside world so I
> -Original Message-
> From: Felipe Leme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 26 octobre 2004 10:54
> To: Cactus Developers List
> Subject: RE: Issue compiling Cactus under JDK 1.5
>
> On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 04:59, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > > Ok, I tested and it works. Should we use it
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 04:59, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > Ok, I tested and it works. Should we use it, even being a RC release? If
> > so, I will ask Carlos to upload it on Ibiblio.
Ok, I will change the code once the new AJ is up on ibiblio.
Now, after the code is changed, it would be nice if the r
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 has an issue affecting its community
integratio
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-cactus-sample-jetty-13 has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-12 has an issue affecting its community
integratio
Hi Felipe,
Warning: Please note that I'm really grateful for all your suggestions. The
only reason I'm arguing some of them is to play the Devil's advocate and see
the issue from the different angles. The idea being that in the end, we're
sure about what we're doing.
See below
> -Original Me
> Here is a condensed patch with all the changes, plus a
> test case and additional check if the directory exists.
Cool :)
> I haven't commit it though, for a reason: once this new
> properties gets through, users will expect a mechanismo
> to include/exclude files, probably using wildcards
>
15 matches
Mail list logo