RE: JBoss 4.x support for Cactus

2004-10-26 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi Markus, Thanks very much for this. Do you think you could create a JIRA issue and attach your patch to it? (http://issues.apache.org/jira). Also, I think it would be good to base your implementation on the JBoss3x implementation that already exists. I'm sure you can reuse at least 80% of

[jira] Updated: (CACTUS-132) Allow cactus plugin to include some resources

2004-10-26 Thread Felipe Leme (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CACTUS-132?page=history ] Felipe Leme updated CACTUS-132: --- Attachment: CACTUS-132-felipeal.patch2 Polished some documentation and updated with CVS (because of CACTUS-132 fix). > Allow cactus plugin to include some re

cvs commit: jakarta-cactus/integration/maven/xdocs changes.xml

2004-10-26 Thread felipeal
felipeal2004/10/26 18:11:30 Modified:integration/maven/xdocs changes.xml Log: added CACTUS-128 Revision ChangesPath 1.48 +4 -0 jakarta-cactus/integration/maven/xdocs/changes.xml Index: changes.xml ==

Re: [jira] Updated: (CACTUS-132) Allow cactus plugin to include some resources

2004-10-26 Thread Felipe Leme
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 06:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think it could be easy to do by adding includes and exclude in the > ant:copy task. It might be, I just haven't tried yet. > Why not using this king of thing ? > cactus.resources.dirs=logResources,otherResources > cactus.resources.logReso

RE: Gump (was Re: Issue compiling Cactus under JDK 1.5)

2004-10-26 Thread Felipe Leme
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 12:34, Vincent Massol wrote: > Ok. I have not been very active in Cactus land recently but I think it would > be a good idea for us to pay attention again to Gump and fix our build. I'm paying attention to the NAGs, but: 1.I was never sure if it was a Cactus or Gump(y) erro

Re: Gump (was Re: Issue compiling Cactus under JDK 1.5)

2004-10-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Stefan, > >> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > But then the Cactus Gump(y) build started to fail very often and >> > every time the reason

RE: Gump (was Re: Issue compiling Cactus under JDK 1.5)

2004-10-26 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi Stefan, > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mardi 26 octobre 2004 15:46 > To: Cactus Developers List > Subject: Gump (was Re: Issue compiling Cactus under JDK 1.5) > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But th

Gump (was Re: Issue compiling Cactus under JDK 1.5)

2004-10-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But then the Cactus Gump(y) build started to fail very often and > every time the reason was either in Gump(y) or in some dependent > project. I was not able to find enough time and energy to continue > fixing the outside world so I

RE: Issue compiling Cactus under JDK 1.5

2004-10-26 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Felipe Leme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: mardi 26 octobre 2004 10:54 > To: Cactus Developers List > Subject: RE: Issue compiling Cactus under JDK 1.5 > > On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 04:59, Vincent Massol wrote: > > > Ok, I tested and it works. Should we use it

RE: Issue compiling Cactus under JDK 1.5

2004-10-26 Thread Felipe Leme
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 04:59, Vincent Massol wrote: > > Ok, I tested and it works. Should we use it, even being a RC release? If > > so, I will ask Carlos to upload it on Ibiblio. Ok, I will change the code once the new AJ is up on ibiblio. Now, after the code is changed, it would be nice if the r

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 (in module jakarta-cactus) failed

2004-10-26 Thread Vincent Massol
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 has an issue affecting its community integratio

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-cactus-sample-jetty-13 (in module jakarta-cactus) failed

2004-10-26 Thread Vincent Massol
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-cactus-sample-jetty-13 has an issue affecting its community integration.

[GUMP@brutus]: Project jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-12 (in module jakarta-cactus) failed

2004-10-26 Thread Vincent Massol
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-12 has an issue affecting its community integratio

RE: [proposal] Using Cargo?

2004-10-26 Thread Vincent Massol
Hi Felipe, Warning: Please note that I'm really grateful for all your suggestions. The only reason I'm arguing some of them is to play the Devil's advocate and see the issue from the different angles. The idea being that in the end, we're sure about what we're doing. See below > -Original Me

Re: [jira] Updated: (CACTUS-132) Allow cactus plugin to include some resources

2004-10-26 Thread Nicolas . CHALUMEAU
> Here is a condensed patch with all the changes, plus a > test case and additional check if the directory exists. Cool :) > I haven't commit it though, for a reason: once this new > properties gets through, users will expect a mechanismo > to include/exclude files, probably using wildcards >