Developers should not want to include some package in its war, like
commons-logging
---
Key: CACTUS-233
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CACTUS-233
Project: Cactus
Type: New
Thanks Stefan. Fixed.
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 23 July 2002 08:08
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [GUMP] [PATCH] there are two jars in commons-logging
>
&
You recent change to Cactus' Gump descriptor leads to
,
| Dropping project jakarta-cactus-distribution-13 because of Exception
|java.lang.Exception: Multiple jars defined by project "commons-logging" referenced by
|project "jakarta-cactus-distribution-13"; an id
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicholas Lesiecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 04 January 2002 16:47
> To: Cactus Developers List
> Subject: Logging
>
> Of course. :) Hey, would it make sense to introduce a logger on each
class
> in the cactus package,
Of course. :) Hey, would it make sense to introduce a logger on each class
in the cactus package, or better yet a log() method that you could simply
call from any class?
I also wanted to refactor the logging aspect, but I got stuck trying to test
my changes.
Re: the subject line. I meant:
>
