RE: [proposal] Build reorganisation

2002-02-26 Thread Nicholas Lesiecki
ol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 February 2002 10:53 > To: 'Cactus Developers List' > Subject: RE: [proposal] Build reorganisation > > Hum I have had a good night to think it over ... :-). Now, I'm not > sure anymore it is a good idea to split the del

RE: [proposal] Build reorganisation

2002-02-26 Thread Nicholas Lesiecki
Although I would have gone with your other plan, I do think this one is the best :) Cheers, nick -Original Message- From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 3:53 AM To: 'Cactus Developers List' Subject: RE: [proposal] Build reorganisa

RE: [proposal] Build reorganisation

2002-02-24 Thread Vincent Massol
ROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 February 2002 10:53 > To: 'Cactus Developers List' > Subject: RE: [proposal] Build reorganisation > > Hum I have had a good night to think it over ... :-). Now, I'm not > sure anymore it is a good idea to split the deliverables (although it >

RE: [proposal] Build reorganisation

2002-02-24 Thread Vincent Massol
ary 2002 23:45 > To: 'Cactus Developers List' > Subject: RE: [proposal] Build reorganisation > > In term of deliverables to download that would mean : > > * Jakarta-cactus-framework.zip > * Jakarta-cactus-ant.zip > * Jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet.zip > * Jakarta-cac

RE: [proposal] Build reorganisation

2002-02-23 Thread Vincent Massol
In term of deliverables to download that would mean : * Jakarta-cactus-framework.zip * Jakarta-cactus-ant.zip * Jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet.zip * Jakarta-cactus-sample-j2ee.zip * Jakarta-cactus-src.zip (the full Jakarta-cactus/ directory) I'm hesitating over the documentation ... Should we ext