Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 2

2017-11-28 Thread Georgios Amanakis
@Pete I think you need to start netserver on the client first (in your case, you are running flent on the server): "ip netns exec client netserver" On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Pete Heist wrote: > > > On Nov 28, 2017, at 11:52 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > >

[Cake] Fwd: Re: cake flenter results round 2

2017-11-28 Thread Georgios Amanakis
I got Dave's netns scripts working on my server. Will try to run rrul tests on a 200/10mbit tonight. George On Nov 28, 2017 7:16 PM, "Pete Heist" wrote: > > > On Nov 28, 2017, at 11:52 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > > > A diffserv 200Mbit result would be good. >

Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 2

2017-11-28 Thread Pete Heist
> On Nov 28, 2017, at 11:52 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > A diffserv 200Mbit result would be good. > > We are utterly out of cpu at 900mbits here. > > Wow, I see flent’s combination plots are handy though. Stuff to sort in irtt also. Merely setting the source IP of an outgoing

Re: [Cake] Simple metrics

2017-11-28 Thread Dave Taht
Pete Heist writes: >> On Nov 28, 2017, at 7:15 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> Pete Heist writes: >> >>>On Nov 27, 2017, at 7:28 PM, Jonathan Morton >>> wrote: >>> >>>An important factor when designing the

Re: [Cake] Cake tree unreadable

2017-11-28 Thread Dave Taht
A flag day here is feasible. I will fiddle along the lines you describe. As for other flag days... I'm toying with the idea of fixing xstats in a separate branch. I really hate the idea of breaking backward compatability here, but I do suspect it will be a barrier to upstreaming, and it is,

Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 2

2017-11-28 Thread Dave Taht
Pete Heist writes: >> On Nov 28, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> Pete Heist writes: >> >>> *** Round 3 Plans: >>> >>> * Use netem to test a spread of simulated rtts and bandwidths. >> >> Since you are leveraging a few too

Re: [Cake] Cake tree unreadable

2017-11-28 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
> On 28 Nov 2017, at 18:48, Dave Taht wrote: > > > > It sounds like your git-foo is stronger than ours! I'm not even trying > to get head to work, tho my intent would be to promote cobalt to it. git checkout master git pull (does the equivalent of git fetch origin; git

[Cake] 1Gbit/20Mbit D/L with ack-filtering

2017-11-28 Thread Dave Taht
Wrote up that result here: http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/ack_filtering/ ___ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake

Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 2

2017-11-28 Thread Pete Heist
> On Nov 28, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > Pete Heist writes: > >> *** Round 3 Plans: >> >> * Use netem to test a spread of simulated rtts and bandwidths. > > Since you are leveraging a few too few boxes, attached are my current > scripts for

Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 2

2017-11-28 Thread Dave Taht
Pete Heist writes: > > *** Round 3 Plans: > > * Use netem to test a spread of simulated rtts and bandwidths. Since you are leveraging a few too few boxes, attached are my current scripts for fiddling a bit with network namespaces. I added individual ssh, irtt, etc, servers

[Cake] Simple metrics

2017-11-28 Thread Dave Taht
Changing the title of the thread. Pete Heist writes: > On Nov 27, 2017, at 7:28 PM, Jonathan Morton > wrote: > > An important factor when designing the test is the difference between > intra-flow and inter-flow induced latencies,

Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 2

2017-11-28 Thread Pete Heist
> On Nov 28, 2017, at 3:11 PM, Pete Heist wrote: > > * still don’t think I managed to get udp flood to work, must be doing > something wrong: > > http://www.drhleny.cz/bufferbloat/cake/round2/udpflood_eg_fq_codel_900mbit/index.html > >