Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 4

2017-12-05 Thread Dave Taht
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Pete Heist wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2017, at 4:29 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > > > *** Round 5 Plans > > * If I do another high RTT test, make rtt 1000ms default and try even higher > > * From Dave: tcp bbr, cdg, reno? dctcp would be weirdly interesting. > > * From Dave: slo

Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 4

2017-12-04 Thread Pete Heist
> On Dec 4, 2017, at 4:29 AM, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> *** Round 5 Plans >> >> * If I do another high RTT test, make rtt 1000ms default and try even higher >> >> * From Dave: tcp bbr, cdg, reno? dctcp would be weirdly interesting. >> >> * From Dave: slot 4ms 4ms bytes 10k 16 >> >> * If I get t

Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 4

2017-12-03 Thread Dave Taht
Pete Heist writes: > http://www.drhleny.cz/bufferbloat/cake/round4/ > > Round 4 Tarball: http://www.drhleny.cz/bufferbloat/cake/round4.tgz > > *** Notes/Analysis *** > > * I took the average satellite Internet latency of 638ms > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_Internet_access) and tried

Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 4

2017-12-03 Thread Pete Heist
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 10:15 PM Jonathan Morton wrote: > Just to note, deficiencies in host fairness are most likely directly > linked to less-than-full throughput. One host is able to use bandwidth > left unused by the other. > I see, that makes sense. Anyway what I wrote earlier about this hi

Re: [Cake] cake flenter results round 4

2017-12-02 Thread Jonathan Morton
Just to note, deficiencies in host fairness are most likely directly linked to less-than-full throughput. One host is able to use bandwidth left unused by the other. - Jonathan Morton ___ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.buffer