HELLO. this was in a presentation half a year ago. thanks for nothing.
On Feb 24, 7:19 pm, jim starboard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have the with association's for HABTM been documented yet? Can't
seem to find any info.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
, 2008 at 5:19 PM, jim starboard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This IS a cake issue. The scaffolding code should not pass an empty
string to the ID field. It should be fixed so that the id is not used
in the generated SQL statement.
On Feb 16, 8:42 am, skantner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Not really sure why this is allowed, but there are places where
inserts are handled with an empty string for an auto-increment
primarykey id. This fails with any strict setup of a db, if there is
auto increment.
There is 3 week old trac listing for this but it really boggles the
mind why you
I have say, I love how I'm put in my place in this group. I think I
finally found a home.
On Feb 24, 6:39 pm, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 24, 6:19 pm, jim starboard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Already there. 3 weeks old. Hard to believe it's not fixed.
Maybe it's because we've got
Have the with association's for HABTM been documented yet? Can't
seem to find any info.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
That wasn't sarcasm. You were right.
On Feb 24, 8:17 pm, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All I'm really saying is, try and show a little respect. I don't
think that's too much to ask.
On Feb 24, 6:44 pm, jim starboard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have say, I love how I'm put in my place
Model Call backs are event related - this is not the way. I think what
I need are associations.
On Feb 22, 9:09 pm, John David Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 22, 2008, at 6:59 PM, jim starboard wrote:
As far as I know, there's no need for multiple-table models
Why
Please stop using the term automagically in the docs. It's an
embarrassment.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To
Despite the naming convention, isn't the HABTM association really just
modeling the shared foreign key table relationship? For example, you
have a 'users' table and an 'items' table, and they are tied together
with the items_users table. Not considering cake, you would use this
because several
thanks guv'ner
On Feb 23, 10:48 pm, rtconner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You got it right.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
I'm setting up my first cakePHP site. Let me explain what I have so
far. Am I off to the right start? Then there are some other questions
below.
I'm doing my home page first. I have the following
views\layouts\default.thtml
- this is the general site html that's repeated everywhere. I have
the
In a view you have $content_for_layout but in the controller you set
it with $layout. What is the motivation behind this?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send
I'm trying to understand how to set up the homepage of my site. I
would like to have my home_controller access various tables in the
database, eg users, games, etc. The problem is, I'm required to have a
home model, but there is no homes table. So I get an error. What's the
best way to have a
model that in turn references
several tables (or child models).
On Feb 22, 8:38 pm, John David Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 22, 2008, at 6:26 PM, jim starboard wrote:
I'm trying to understand how to set up the homepage of my site. I
would like to have my home_controller access
://manual.cakephp.orgwill show it in
a very easy way. just try it.
Spark
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 5:43 PM, jim starboard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get a high-level understanding of how you would handle a
site's homepage. Lets say it's a gaming site. Some of the items on the
homepage would
some docs out there about that and problems with
efficiency. However, CakePHP has some beautiful caching which makes this
livable
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:46 AM, jim starboard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry about getting off on the wrong foot.
I think my main question is: Should I
This IS a cake issue. The scaffolding code should not pass an empty
string to the ID field. It should be fixed so that the id is not used
in the generated SQL statement.
On Feb 16, 8:42 am, skantner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to say thanks also, Ben. This was really annoying me. I
http://manual.cakephp.org/chapter/models
durint instead of during
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
http://manual.cakephp.org/chapter/models
array(Post.title = This is a post)
the third quote is in the wrong place no?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send
19 matches
Mail list logo
