On May 9, 3:06 pm, Ma'moon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The online manual is great and a very big thank you for everyone who put an
> effort on it! but i have a small note if i am allowed to say so, the font of
> the content is relatively small and i think making it a lil bit bigger would
> feel m
The online manual is great and a very big thank you for everyone who put an
effort on it! but i have a small note if i am allowed to say so, the font of
the content is relatively small and i think making it a lil bit bigger would
feel much more comfortable while reading rather than pressing "Ctrl +
For me the load-time can be 15-20sec for the all-in-one page. I guess
that is the one being referred to as slow.
I found a few things that may result in long load-time (apart from the
15000 lines of html).
The page contains non-html tags like: "" a few times.
The page contains empty and tags, en
On May 9, 9:50 am, Knud Soerensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. The cookbook have added a lot of pages.
> But there is still 4 issues which should be addressed.
>
> 1) It is just too slow. Waiting 45s for a page to load is not good.
> Someone need to take a look why this is happing.
Which
To get a pdf of the 1.2 cookbook do:
1. Go to:
http://www.easysw.com/htmldoc/pdf-o-matic.php
2. Enter the following url in the field:
http://book.cakephp.org/complete/3/the-manual
3. Click: Create pdf.
You may have to wait around 60 secs or so for the pdf to show up.
--~--~-~--~~-
Yes. The cookbook have added a lot of pages.
But there is still 4 issues which should be addressed.
1) It is just too slow. Waiting 45s for a page to load is not good.
Someone need to take a look why this is happing.
2) Also I wish the structure was more cookbook like
with recipes which is sma
I think the url is down right now.
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:21 AM, Aaron Shafovaloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> It's been sporadically unresponsive today. Perhaps they're not
> caching?
>
> On May 8, 11:04 am, "Sliv (Tim MacAleese)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, indeed, I use it a lot t
Where did you get PDF version of it? I want too. Dont like online
docs.
On 9 май, 01:33, keymaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just had a look today using a pdf created version of the 1.2
> cookbook. It currently weighs in at over 330 pages!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~---
It's been sporadically unresponsive today. Perhaps they're not
caching?
On May 8, 11:04 am, "Sliv (Tim MacAleese)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, indeed, I use it a lot too - maybe at some point there will be a
> way to mirror it to contributed servers so it doesn't get too slow due
> to the s
Yes, indeed, I use it a lot too - maybe at some point there will be a
way to mirror it to contributed servers so it doesn't get too slow due
to the size and number of people using it :P
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
I might disagree on the way the book is structured, but I'd have to
agree that it has come a long way. I use it a lot now. Good job, guys.
On May 8, 10:33 am, keymaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's time to change the initial knee-jerk reaction when
> speaking about cake's documentati
I think it's time to change the initial knee-jerk reaction when
speaking about cake's documentation.
If I remember correctly, only 3-4 months ago there was something like
190 pages. Most of the new 1.2 features were either totally
undocumented, or sparse at best.
I just had a look today using a
12 matches
Mail list logo
