Well this is all good news. Sounds like I'm migrating to 1.2 :-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
I'll pipe in here to say that the next version of SlideShowPro
Director (1.1) will run on Cake 1.2. We've been in beta testing for a
few months now, and with our current release candidate installed on
north of 500 domains, we haven't seen any Cake related issues. Issues
of my own making, however,
@Ismael
Then why are you still on this list? Or why even bother responding?
I think the expression is "if you dont have something nice to say,
dont say it at all"
@Troy
http://ahsanity.wordpress.com/2007/08/29/cakephp-12-the-romance-continues/
http://www.cakephp.org/files/OCPHP.pdf
--~--~--
On Sep 10, 2007, at 2:06 PM, Troy Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Show me how to build Digg with Ruby on Rails and I will believe that
>> RoR is better than a PHP-backed solution. There, I said it.
>
> I certainly agree with that sentiment (hence, why I built the site
> with CakePHP in the first place). I'
smart, be cool, and share your knowledge.
>
> BAKE ON!
>
> blog:http://www.MarianoIglesias.com.ar
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre
> de Ismael S. Kafeltz
> Enviado el: Lunes, 10 de Septiembre de 2007 04:47 p.m.
&g
> Show me how to build Digg with Ruby on Rails and I will believe that
> RoR is better than a PHP-backed solution. There, I said it.
I certainly agree with that sentiment (hence, why I built the site
with CakePHP in the first place). I've read all of "The David's"
presentations (and books) on Ro
My EURO 0.02
I would personally like to applaud and thank the CakePHP team for remaining
focused on releasing *quality* software rather than pumping up their version
numbers like so many commercial products. I am quite happy to wait as long
as it takes for 1.2 in the knowledge it'll be solid and
el: Lunes, 10 de Septiembre de 2007 04:47 p.m.
Para: Cake PHP
Asunto: Re: 1.2 ready for prime time?
I abandoned cake few days ago and now I'm using Ruby on Rails because
I think cake takes too much time to evolve and I could wait more one
year to finally use it seriously.
In my opinion you s
On 9/10/07, Ismael S. Kafeltz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I abandoned cake few days ago and now I'm using Ruby on Rails because
> I think cake takes too much time to evolve and I could wait more one
> year to finally use it seriously.
> In my opinion you should study RoR before rework/expansion
I abandoned cake few days ago and now I'm using Ruby on Rails because
I think cake takes too much time to evolve and I could wait more one
year to finally use it seriously.
In my opinion you should study RoR before rework/expansion because you
will have immediately results.
On 10 set, 15:50, "Tro
On 9/10/07, Troy Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm wondering how stable 1.2 is currently? I've got a site with a
> minimal feature set currently built with 1.1 and we're about to do a
> significant rework/expansion of the site over the next month. Would it
> make sense to migrate to 1.2?
I'm wondering how stable 1.2 is currently? I've got a site with a
minimal feature set currently built with 1.1 and we're about to do a
significant rework/expansion of the site over the next month. Would it
make sense to migrate to 1.2? Where can I go to get a good comparison
of 1.1 vs. 1.2 in rega
12 matches
Mail list logo
