Re: Pure Flex

2007-03-04 Thread gwoo
actually, this is the most recent article: http://cakeamfphp.rd11.org/ ;) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake PHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To

Re: Pure Flex

2007-03-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
any major differences between the .4 and .5 gateway? can i easily upgrade? thnx On Mar 4, 4:45 am, gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: actually, this is the most recent article:http://cakeamfphp.rd11.org/ ;) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because

Re: Pure Flex

2007-03-03 Thread f.
Hi, I only once did a test with Flex, and I used Cake as the backend to supply XML responses. It worked fine... Provide an appropriate layout like this: ?php header('Content-type: text/xml'); ? ?php echo '?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8 ?'; ? ?php echo $content_for_layout; ? and generate the

Re: Pure Flex

2007-03-03 Thread Grant Cox
When I've used CakeAMFPHP I usually keep html views too - so I can test an action from html as well as Flash (I haven't used Flex). Just make your actions return the same data that they set(), so both the HTML and AMF get the same data from the action. But I'm not sure what is confusing you

Re: Pure Flex

2007-03-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sure it's quite possible. I'm currently doing this with Flash and AMFPHP. Here's one issue though - Cake's architecture has many view pages...which you could sure enough setup with Flex/Flash but then that create multiple flash files. You may want only one Flash/Flex swf file. You may not

Pure Flex

2007-03-02 Thread randomblink
Alrighty... I am designing an app that is 100% flex on the client side. The only HTML will be the Flex Holder Page... EVERYTHING else will be Flex talking to AMFPHP through the Gateway and CakePHP being the framework on the server-side. I have printed out the CakePHP manual, the CakeAMFPHP