A good alternative.
Laurie
West MI
--- On Wed, 5/9/12, Andrea Nettleton wrote:
> From: Andrea Nettleton
> Subject: Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume
> To: "Caller's discussion list"
> Date:
I would subscribe to the new list and would be fine with keeping them
together or separate, I don't really care.
I would like to know what the WebContent list is. I'm unfamiliar with
that list.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Laur wrote:
> I echo Bob's sentiment.
>
> Laurie
>
My web site is a haven for people to publish their dances and also has a
comment feature.
Michael Barraclough
www.michaelbarraclough.com
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 15:56 -0400, Janet Bertog wrote:
> I was wondering if there would be some way that a website could be set up
> where new dances could
One method of having one list, but keeping the new dance discussions sorted is
the old OT trick, but instead of OT we would use ND (New Dance), or some other
designator, as a preface to the name of the dance under discussion. That being
the subject of the email, anyone not interested could
I like Chris's suggestions, but will add a few:
Sicilian Circle Waltz - time
---
Waterfall Waltz
Nan's Waltz
Margaret's Waltz (has four bars of closed waltz)
The Molly Andrew
Longways
---
Midnight Ramble
Mulberry Garden
The Hop Ground
Trip to
I have just done that. Thanks, David, I didn't know about it.
Lindsay Morris
CEO, TSMworks
Tel. 1-859-539-9900
lind...@tsmworks.com
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:26 PM, David Millstone
wrote:
> One overall suggestion is to get a copy of "21 Easy
Perfect!!
Thanks so much, Chris!
Lindsay Morris
CEO, TSMworks
Tel. 1-859-539-9900
lind...@tsmworks.com
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Chris Page wrote:
> Off the top of my head:
>
> Sets:
> Upon a Summer's Day
> Rufty Tufty
> Heartease
> Leah's Waltz
Off the top of my head:
Sets:
Upon a Summer's Day
Rufty Tufty
Heartease
Leah's Waltz
Longways:
Hole in the Wall
Rafe's Waltz
Morgan Rattler
Mary and Dorothy
Madiera Dream
Freeford Gardens
The Duke of Kent's Waltz
Draper's Gardens
The First of April
Prince William of Glo's'ter's Waltz (using half
If we are going to post and vet new dances, I am quite certain a separate
list would be preferable. Our little caller's group here in Missouri would
alone double the word volume of the current list. While the total volume
would be the same, I think there would be distinct advantages to having the
One overall suggestion is to get a copy of "21 Easy English Country Dances," a
booklet with accompanying CD, available from CDSS:
http://www.cdss.org/product-details/product/id-21-easy-english-country-dances-booklet-with-cd.html
It's a collection of classic dances with plenty of variety of
I prefer one list that includes choreography. The list volume is not too heavy
here for my taste; I start using delete when a discussion is going on and
on.
Bree Kalb
Carrboro, NC
-Original Message-
>From: "Chris Weiler (home)"
>Sent: May 9, 2012
I'd vote for one list. Easy enough to search for the title if a dance there.
On May 9, 2012, at 3:56 PM, "Janet Bertog" wrote:
> I was wondering if there would be some way that a website could be set up
> where new dances could be posted that people could go to. That could
I was wondering if there would be some way that a website could be set up
where new dances could be posted that people could go to. That could keep
the traffic on the list down. The problem that I see with that is that
people wouldn't be able to discuss the dances as easily, or if they did the
I'd rather keep it on this list until there's enough traffic to
support another list. There's a minimum amount of traffic needed to
keep a list alive.
Anyone remember WebContent?
Dead for six months after a brief flurry of initial posts.
Musicians?
Just has the rare press release.
And those
I would subscribe. Although I'm pretty sure that nearly everyone on the
callers list would be on the choreography list so the volume of mail would stay
the same. And since knowing choreography is an important part of being a
caller that I would think that one list would suffice. Volume
Hello SW callers,
I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about
starting a new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all
callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have them be the same
list? My only answer that I could think of why not is if the
Last weekend Susan Moffett called this dance at the Lexington dance. I
loved the first part. Cary Ravitz and I worked on another alternate version
of it that he has up on his page now:
http://ravitz.us/miscdances/#rr. He just called it Raeden Reel alternate,
but it is actually very very close
Hi All:
Nice to see this dance has been well received so far. I'm sure it makes a
proud Dad even prouder. For those interested, here's some background on the
choreography of this dance. The A1 is not new, and goes back over 10 years to
a dance I wrote for Jim Kitch:
Kitch as Kitch Can
When I think of mentorship, I'm thinking of a one-to-one relationship where one
experienced caller really guides a newbie, but I don't think I went through
that per se. Tom Hinds taught a 4-week (maybe more? I forget) caller's
workshop back in 2002, and I jumped at the chance for the
I was just thinking the opposite. I think learning dances and knowing dances
and how they flow is a supremely huge part of being a caller and learning
calling skills. I don't think another list is necessary - especially
considering that most if not all of us will be on that other list anyways.
Contra calling is a relatively easy skill to learn--much easier than mastering
fiddle-playing, auto repair, child rearing or Photoshop. After getting
several hours of initial instruction in contra calling, the challenge becomes
getting 40-100 hours practice over 10- 50 dance events needed to
I may have missed it, but I haven't seen William Watson's excellent collection
of caller resources.
http://www.quiteapair.us/calling/
Rich
Although I definitely appreciate and incorporate the discussions of new dances
in this list, I would also appreciate, and mostly prefer, a differentiation.
I would like to know that this is the list for calling and another list I can
gravitate to for new dances and discussions on them. I
I have just recently joined this list and I am very new to calling. I took
a caller's workshop at Contradancer's Delight Holiday and have called one
half night and one full night at my local dance. But, I would like to point
out that Cary Ravitz has a tremendous resource on his webpage
Agree with Brian - sharing dances here would be a most useful resource for
increasing one's repertoire!
Perry
Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
I love the idea, and I would utilize it as a very useful resource. I'm not so
concerned about deeing possibly inferior material ... I'd be interested in the
exchange of ideas.
Bring it on!
Brian Hamshar
Virginia
Alan Winston wrote:
>On 5/8/2012 6:35 PM, Mark
This sounds great! A centralized resource for sharing dances -- new or not --
is something I would consult and post to often.
Brian Hamshar
Virginia
Mark Hillegonds wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've been following with interest the discussion on calling and mentorships.
>Ron
27 matches
Mail list logo