On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Richard Jones wrote:
> Decide on a format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DocBook - check
I have written one open source book, and participated in another, and
DocBook was always a barrier of entrance for most potential
contributors. These days I'd rather go for some
Hello
I'm happy to announce the first public release of OSpec, an RSpec-inspired
Behavior-Driven Development library for OCaml using a Camlp4 syntax
extension. You can download this release from the ocamlcore forge at
http://forge.ocamlcore.org/projects/ospec/
or directly clone the repository
You could start with this: http://fr.wikibooks.org/wiki/Objective_Caml .
I have only had the time to write about 3 chapters (in French) but it
could serve as a base. Oh, and the license and source control are mostly
solved by the use of Wikibooks.
Cheers,
David
_
The Second Answer Set Programming Competition
Call For Participation
K.U.Leuven, Belgium, spring 2009
http://www.cs.kuleuven.be/~dtai/events/ASP-competiti
Nice code!!! Thank you very much.
I'm trying to get the Module name, then used in my syntax extension.
ModuleName.[ my extension ]
It's really a great idea to perform checking in the rule definition.
Conglun
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Zheng Li wrote:
> On 4/2/2009 1:42 PM, Conglun Yao
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Richard Jones wrote:
>
> It doesn't take a huge amount to set this up (encouraging people to
> write the words is quite another matter).
>
> Source control: http://git.ocamlcore.org/ - check
>
> Decide on a format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DocBook - check
>
> L
It doesn't take a huge amount to set this up (encouraging people to
write the words is quite another matter).
Source control: http://git.ocamlcore.org/ - check
Decide on a format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DocBook - check
License: http://creativecommons.org/ CC-BY-SA - check
Mailing list fo
Great idea, would be a pleasure to contribute something to the caml community.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Joel Reymont wrote:
>
> On Apr 2, 2009, at 7:08 PM, Richard Jones wrote:
>
>> So you might want to think about an alternate method of authorship,
>> such as a version-controlled, shared
On Apr 2, 2009, at 7:08 PM, Richard Jones wrote:
So you might want to think about an alternate method of authorship,
such as a version-controlled, shared document, that allows
contributions and comes under a Free license of some sort.
Like the Django Book!
http://www.djangobook.com/
---
Mac
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:40:33PM +0200, Alp Mestan wrote:
> I think many of us would enjoy writing some paragraphs for such a project...
> But would there be enough people to achieve the writing of an entire (and
> good) book ?
Once you get into the realm of having lots of authors writing an
"OC
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 02:37:28PM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote:
> . Post 3.10 camlp4.
This one is really crying out for a book or some sort of good
reference ...
Rich.
--
Richard Jones
Red Hat
___
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://y
It's far more than just about human ressources.
What you describe is some sort of "OCaml Bible".
First you have to decide what book you want.
If you do an OCaml Bible then probably some beginners will lack an introductory
text.
If you do an introductory text then probably more experienced people
Indeed, as I said above, a book on "today's OCaml" should cover a wide
variety of topics (syntax extensions with camlp4/5, general purpose
libraries, specific libraries like ocamlnet, GTK+ and OpenGL binding, etc).
To write such a book, there would be the need for many authors with time and
knowled
On Thursday 02 April 2009 13:41:01 Ed Keith wrote:
> Having said that, I currently have some free time time and would be willing
> to offer my assistance to this project. It would give me the opportunity to
> hone my writing and ocaml skills, and I believe as an experienced
> professional programme
On 4/2/2009 1:42 PM, Conglun Yao wrote:
Different kinds of error happened, when trying to use it.
Even the ordinary expression: List.length [1; 2;3 ], failed. 'List'
is parsed as module_longident, try to match the rule I defined.
Thanks for any help.
Conglun
You may have a look at the so
David and Jérémie,
Thanks for your guys quick response.
It seems I get idea how to achieve it. pa_do and pa_open are useful!
It's a pity I viewed the code of pa_infix before, but never noticed it
was part of a project.
Conglun
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:40 PM, David Teller
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'
--- On Thu, 4/2/09, Alp Mestan wrote:
> I think it would be a better effort to start a new work, even if harder.
> OCaml's has known some evolutions, there are many key projects (Extlib, >
> Core, Batteries, ...) so it would be nice to throw most of today's OCaml > in
> an entirely new book. M
Hi,
I'm not going to quite answer your question yet -- I'd need to check
the source of Camlp4 for this. However, I can point out that what you're
trying to do looks very much like pa_open, by Alain Frisch.
let _ = open M1.M2 in e
will execute [e] using module [M1.M2].
Cheers,
David
On Thu,
Conglun Yao wrote:
> I tried to achieve the following syntax extension, but failed.
>
> Add expression .[ ] after a module name, inside .[ ] I want to refer
> to the specified module, like
>
> let _ = M1.M2.[ here is my syntax, using M1.M2 module ]
You should have a look at delimited overloadin
Dear all,
I tried to achieve the following syntax extension, but failed.
Add expression .[ ] after a module name, inside .[ ] I want to refer
to the specified module, like
let _ = M1.M2.[ here is my syntax, using M1.M2 module ]
Here is my attempt (failed)
EXTEND Gram
GLOBAL: expr;
expr: LEV
Xavier Leroy schrieb:
> Maybe that shouldn't be titled "tutorial" at all.
The manual has been a known PR disaster for ages.
http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2002/10/72ebe64a56c256607772b32ceb58197d.en.html
- Florian.
___
Caml-list mailin
From: Goswin von Brederlow
> I want to keep a linked list of structures that have a common subset
> of functionality. I thought this would be a good use of ocaml objects.
> A base class with the common subset of functionality and methods to
> link them. And then derived classes for the specific t
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> It could be nice to translate it in English, at least to have a
>>> larger base of readers, and adapt the examples from Caml Light to
>>> Objective Caml (I don't know how much the syntaxes differ though)
>>>
>>
>> The syntax is very close f
It could be nice to translate it in English, at least to have a
larger base of readers, and adapt the examples from Caml Light to
Objective Caml (I don't know how much the syntaxes differ though)
The syntax is very close for the subset of Caml used in the book.
Right. Parts of the standar
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 22:23, Matthieu Wipliez wrote:
> Isn't the book written in French? (I mean "Le langage Caml"...).
Yes.
> It could be nice to translate it in English, at least to have a larger base
> of readers, and adapt the examples from Caml Light to Objective Caml (I don't
>
I believe I have envisaged a useful and feasible way to combine the benefits
of OCaml's GC with efficient parallel programming without requiring a
concurrent GC.
I have been considering the ramifications of being able to quote HLVM code in
camlp4 macros as a DSL from within OCaml programs. Tha
26 matches
Mail list logo
